From: Adam B. <ada...@gm...> - 2018-09-11 06:14:31
|
That's a pretty neat idea too, and I can see how it would work. Adam On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 at 23:16, Eero Aaltonen <eer...@ik...> wrote: > Relatedly someone has apparently already implemented the "report me any > new library versions" part > https://github.com/ben-manes/gradle-versions-plugin > > -- > Eero > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 3:50 PM Eero Aaltonen <eer...@ik...> > wrote: > >> Hope I'm not late to the party. >> >> Personally I would prefer to have the defaults the other way around, >> namely: >> - default to fixed versions >> - grab the latest versions, if requested. >> >> Although Gradle has the concept of variants, I did not find variant >> support Java libraries. Instead, I wrote my own using an environment >> variable in >> https://github.com/eaaltonen/gradle-dependency-proposal >> >> The idea is that you could test against the latest versions of libraries >> very easily just by specifying `DEPS=latest` before the build. >> >> -- >> Eero >> >> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 4:29 AM Adam Burke <ada...@gm...> >> wrote: >> >>> Good topic. It’s really really good to see Jython moving to declared >>> dependency management instead of a jar folder. 2 cents from me ... >>> >>> At work I have always favoured strictly pinned versions, for determinism >>> / repeatability reasons. Being able to reproduce exactly the classes being >>> used at a particular point in time can be invaluable with deep dependency >>> trees and wide usage of different versions. >>> >>> People usually aren’t too shy about forcing different dependency >>> versions if needed in my experience. >>> >>> I do see some advantages to the less strict versions, around maintenance >>> and advertising to developers the choice of specific version is somewhat >>> arbitrary (which it often is, especially when talking about patch versions.) >>> >>> This blog post has a good discussion about pinned versions >>> >>> https://brock.io/post/repeatable_android_builds/ >>> >>> >>> It also points on to an interesting dependency lock plugin. >>> >>> https://github.com/nebula-plugins/gradle-dependency-lock-plugin >>> >>> I haven’t used that plugin in anger, but it might allow the best of both >>> worlds. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Adam >>> >>> 在 2018年8月14日,上午5:36,Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> 写道: >>> >>> One of the things we were looking forward to with Gradle was that it >>> would become easier to control the versions of JARs (modules) we depend on. >>> Gradle can get quite sophisticated about this: you can have anything you >>> want. Only ... what do we want? >>> >>> * If we only specify a module name, we'll get the latest all the time >>> (with obvious risks). >>> * If a module moves to a new API we aren't ready for, we can specify >>> the version in part (3.1.+), and continue to take minor/patch releases. >>> * If a module has to be pinned to an exact version, we can name it >>> explicitly (or an acceptable range). >>> >>> At least we don't have to check the JAR in: just change the dependency >>> statements (once we use Gradle exclusively). If we build distributions with >>> Gradle like the JARs we build now, I believe we end up jarjar'ring the >>> dynamically downloaded modules, but I haven't tried that yet. >>> >>> A second dimension is when other projects cite Jython as a dependency >>> and get our dependencies transitively. Consuming projects are able to >>> override our version choices (if I understand correctly, >>> https://docs.gradle.org/current/userguide/managing_transitive_dependencies.html#sec:enforcing_dependency_version). >>> The less specific we are about version, the more helpful to consumers. >>> However, these might be untested combinations. >>> >>> Any thoughts how to tell, for a given module, what the sensible policy >>> would be? >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Allen >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jython-dev mailing list >>> Jyt...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most >>> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jython-dev mailing list >>> Jyt...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev >>> >> |