Re: [Jython-dev] Modular Java and the accessibility of methods

[Jeff A. <ja...@fa...>]

In small steps on this, I have refactored PyJavaType.init from its 
original 560 lines to nearer 250 and a dozen helpers, with no change in 
meaning at this point. In the past, I have had to step through this code 
a lot and invariably I've lost my way. As I'll be doing more of that 
now, this ought to help.

I can't say I understand everything it does yet (which makes sensible 
decisions more difficult). There is some helpful stuff around Java 
accessibility that I think I can adapt.

Jeff

Jeff Allen

On 05/04/2018 21:28, Jeff Allen wrote:
> Java 9 is throwing us an interesting problem. This will be an issue 
> wherever the factory pattern is used, and the actual class of object 
> handed out may be a private implementation class not exported to the 
> unnamed module. It's a common pattern.
>
> In Java, the compile-time type of the object is the public type the 
> factory method returns. The implementation type extends or implements 
> that "API" type, and it is the public methods of the API type that the 
> compiled code references. In Jython, we end up trying to reference the 
> implementation mthods directly. Java 9 forbids this, or at least 
> grumbles about it unattractively.
>
> I have an idea to resolve it, but it alters the Python type of a Java 
> class. Could be good or bad. What do others think?
>
> More in the text of the issue. http://bugs.jython.org/issue2662
>