Re: [Jython-dev] Jython 3: greenhorn questions from an old hand

[Stefan R. <Ste...@gm...>]

I really recommend that we (at least try to) merge 2.7.1 work into Jython 3 as far as and wherever possible.
That means, really go back to the spot where 3 was forked from 2.7 and look at every single commit and merge it.
I suppose this can be done in a semi-automated manner. Maybe it's not possible entirely with github GUI, but
maybe we can save the changesets somehow. Git certainly has a way to use a changeset file as input for its
merging algorithm. Ideally we would have a script that applies all changes that are automatically mergable.
Every changeset that cannot be merged automatically should get a look (from its author ideally).
Either it can be adjusted with reasonable effort, or it is maybe not applicable to Jython 3 for fundamental reasons.

We should do this before Jython 3 and 2 diverge even more. Chances that automatic approach is vastly applicable will
decrease more and more. I really doubt I can motivate myself much to work on a Jython 3 codebase that is full of
issues we already solved. I'd rather much prefer to fix things that might break due to the merge process.

Unfortunately I cannot help much on this process right now, because GSoC is about to launch.
Will be in for Jython 3 later this year again.

Best

-Stefan



> Gesendet: Montag, 29. Mai 2017 um 12:07 Uhr
> Von: "Jeff Allen" <ja...@fa...>
> An: "Jython Developers" <jyt...@li...>
> Betreff: [Jython-dev] Jython 3: greenhorn questions from an old hand
>
> With 2.7.1 seemingly on its release journey, I have a bit of time to 
> hack on Jython 3.  A lot has been done to Jython 3 since it forked from 
> 2, so I have some really newbie questions:
> 
>   * Is https://github.com/jython/jython3 the official reference
>     repository? (Is https://hg.python.org/sandbox/jython3 dead?)
>   * Are we still building with Ant? (It didn't for me on Windows, and I
>     thought I'd fix that first.) BTW, this is a question about now, not
>     what we'd like to do in future.
>   * Versions: Java 8, and Python 3.5?
>   * Although I believe I could commit directly to
>     https://github.com/jython/jython3, or a branch in there, do we agree
>     a better practice is to fork, branch and create a PR for a "feature"
>     (groups of related commits)? Even if I then accept my own PR, it
>     seems to give us a better audit trail, integration test, squash
>     point, etc.. A separate thread/discussion is due about workflow,
>     naming, etc..
>   * Do we agree that our aim is to run the CPython regression tests with
>     as few skips, exclusions and replacement tests as possible?
>   * Does anyone have code stored up that I risk duplicating? (E.g.
>     Somewhere, Darjus mentioned ANTLR4 migration.) Otherwise I'll just
>     start with things I know about (bytes and strings, buffer interface,
>     io, import perhaps), driven by getting Py3k tests to pass honestly.
> 
> I will averaging much fewer than 3 commits a day. ;)
> 
> -- 
> 
> Jeff Allen
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-dev mailing list
> Jyt...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
>