|
From: Frank W. <fwi...@gm...> - 2007-09-03 16:27:51
|
On 9/3/07, Frank Wierzbicki <fwi...@gm...> wrote: > If we make it pluggable the way we do with readline, I'd say we can > just see where it goes and give it a try. If it turns out that we > can't distribute jna.jar -- we can hopefully have simple instructions > (much simpler than the readline instructions since there is no compile > step). Also, if it is written in a pluggable style, we might > eventually find a BSD licensed jar that we could use instead so that > distribution ability is unambiguous. So I took another look at JNA, and it looks like it will need to get distributed with some os-specific code. While this doesn't kill the idea -- I think it puts it squarely into the area of being an optional plugin, since there will need to be one for each os. -Frank |