From: Dan S. <drs...@gm...> - 2012-04-09 00:23:25
|
FWIW, 2.5.3b1 is passing http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/backshift/'s unit tests, and I was able to remove the os.utime workaround I'd been using with 2.5.2. It seems like a pretty solid release from my standpoint. |
From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2012-04-09 14:47:42
|
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dan Stromberg <drs...@gm...> wrote: > > FWIW, 2.5.3b1 is passing http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/backshift/ > 's unit tests, and I was able to remove the os.utime workaround I'd been > using with 2.5.2. > > It seems like a pretty solid release from my standpoint. I think we'll put out one more beta - probably this week (because there are numerous new bug fixes in the 2.5 branch now), and then have at least one release candidate. My plan is to get a 2.5.3 final out before April is out. -Frank |
From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2012-04-11 17:40:05
|
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 7:47 AM, fwi...@gm... <fwi...@gm...> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Dan Stromberg <drs...@gm...> wrote: >> >> FWIW, 2.5.3b1 is passing http://stromberg.dnsalias.org/~strombrg/backshift/ >> 's unit tests, and I was able to remove the os.utime workaround I'd been >> using with 2.5.2. >> >> It seems like a pretty solid release from my standpoint. > I think we'll put out one more beta - probably this week (because The next beta might not make it out this week - this bug http://bugs.jython.org/issue1871 is a blocker IMO and may not get fixed before the week is out. Most likely the beta2 will come out next week. -Frank |