From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2014-03-29 20:01:30
|
Hi all, I have put together a soft launch of Jython 2.7b2. This fits in with the way uploads to the maven.org repository work. An upload is staged and then if all is well I push another button and the release becomes permanent. I think I'll let these hang out for about a week so we can test for problems and do the real launch next weekend. The releases: Installer: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1008/org/python/jython-installer/2.7-b2/jython-installer-2.7-b2.jar Standalone: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1009/org/python/jython-standalone/2.7-b2/jython-standalone-2.7-b2.jar Raw jar (w/o jar dependencies bundled): https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1010/org/python/jython/2.7-b2/jython-2.7-b2.jar The parent directories of each of the above have the checksums, source jars, javadocs, etc. -Frank |
From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2014-03-29 20:55:54
|
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, fwi...@gm... < fwi...@gm...> wrote: > The releases: > > Installer: > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1008/org/python/jython-installer/2.7-b2/jython-installer-2.7-b2.jar > > Standalone: > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1009/org/python/jython-standalone/2.7-b2/jython-standalone-2.7-b2.jar > > Raw jar (w/o jar dependencies bundled): > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1010/org/python/jython/2.7-b2/jython-2.7-b2.jar > Note that when the release becomes final - these URLs will become invalid and will be replaced by new final ones - so if you publish them somewhere make sure you mention that they are ephemeral. -Frank |
From: Josh J. <jun...@gm...> - 2014-03-30 00:38:32
|
Is Jython 2.7 b2 going to be sanctioned for use with Java 8? I just installed it and wrote a simple JavaFX 8 program with it...seems to work without issues. Thanks Josh Juneau jun...@gm... http://jj-blogger.blogspot.com https://www.apress.com/index.php/author/author/view/id/1866 On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 3:55 PM, fwi...@gm... < fwi...@gm...> wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, fwi...@gm... < > fwi...@gm...> wrote: > >> The releases: >> >> Installer: >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1008/org/python/jython-installer/2.7-b2/jython-installer-2.7-b2.jar >> >> Standalone: >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1009/org/python/jython-standalone/2.7-b2/jython-standalone-2.7-b2.jar >> >> Raw jar (w/o jar dependencies bundled): >> https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1010/org/python/jython/2.7-b2/jython-2.7-b2.jar >> > Note that when the release becomes final - these URLs will become invalid > and will be replaced by new final ones - so if you publish them somewhere > make sure you mention that they are ephemeral. > > -Frank > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Jython-dev mailing list > Jyt...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev > > |
From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2014-03-30 03:37:22
|
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Josh Juneau <jun...@gm...> wrote: > Is Jython 2.7 b2 going to be sanctioned for use with Java 8? I just > installed it and wrote a simple JavaFX 8 program with it...seems to work > without issues. > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, fwi...@gm... < > fwi...@gm...> wrote: > I hope it works on Java 8 though I haven't tried it. We're moving the minimum up to Java 7 and plan to put in some Java 7 dependencies before a final release (some of Jim's work and some pull requests require Java 7). Glad to know it works for you on Java 8 - I think Alan Kennedy may have tried it there too. -Frank |
From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2014-03-30 11:22:10
|
Congratulations to Frank on getting this far. I'm sure this will help our pace. I have installed with "java -jar jython-installer-2.7-b2.jar", on Windows 7, including source and documentation. This went smoothly. I ran the regression tests. With Java 7 I get 22 failures on Windows, which is up quite a bit from what I have come to expect (about 12) in the development environment. Many are familiar, including the float ones I'm working on at present, and some are cascades (due to non-deletion of files), but some look like they may be problems with building the installer. In particular some relate to missing idna codecs I believe Jim added. I wonder if the related jars are not getting distributed, or onto the class path? I'll send the output of "jython -m test.regrtest -e -w" (193K) separately to Frank and anyone who asks. Should we have failing tests in (even) a beta release? I'd feel happier about inserting skips if I knew there was a "FIXME thermometer" somewhere that would move me to treat the underlying causes. Jeff Jeff Allen On 30/03/2014 04:37, fwi...@gm... wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Josh Juneau <jun...@gm... > <mailto:jun...@gm...>> wrote: > > Is Jython 2.7 b2 going to be sanctioned for use with Java 8? I > just installed it and wrote a simple JavaFX 8 program with > it...seems to work without issues. > On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 1:01 PM, fwi...@gm... > <mailto:fwi...@gm...> <fwi...@gm... > <mailto:fwi...@gm...>> wrote: > > I hope it works on Java 8 though I haven't tried it. We're moving the > minimum up to Java 7 and plan to put in some Java 7 dependencies > before a final release (some of Jim's work and some pull requests > require Java 7). > > Glad to know it works for you on Java 8 - I think Alan Kennedy may > have tried it there too. > > -Frank > |
From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2014-03-30 16:22:35
|
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> wrote: > > Congratulations to Frank on getting this far. I'm sure this will help our > pace. > > I have installed with "java -jar jython-installer-2.7-b2.jar", on Windows > 7, including source and documentation. This went smoothly. > > I ran the regression tests. With Java 7 I get 22 failures on Windows, > which is up quite a bit from what I have come to expect (about 12) in the > development environment. Many are familiar, including the float ones I'm > working on at present, and some are cascades (due to non-deletion of > files), but some look like they may be problems with building the installer. > > In particular some relate to missing idna codecs I believe Jim added. I > wonder if the related jars are not getting distributed, or onto the class > path? > Weird - we should definitely look into that. > > I'll send the output of "jython -m test.regrtest -e -w" (193K) separately > to Frank and anyone who asks. > That's good to know - thanks for doing this investigation! > > Should we have failing tests in (even) a beta release? I'd feel happier > about inserting skips if I knew there was a "FIXME thermometer" somewhere > that would move me to treat the underlying causes. > We really shouldn't have failing tests in beta releases - but since it's been a year since beta1 and there are so many improvements I thought it was a good idea to just do it and fix things up by beta3 (I hope). -Frank |
From: Jeff A. <ja...@fa...> - 2014-03-31 19:08:27
|
On 30/03/2014 17:22, fwi...@gm... wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Jeff Allen <ja...@fa... > <mailto:ja...@fa...>> wrote: > > > Should we have failing tests in (even) a beta release? I'd feel > happier about inserting skips if I knew there was a "FIXME > thermometer" somewhere that would move me to treat the underlying > causes. > > We really shouldn't have failing tests in beta releases - but since > it's been a year since beta1 and there are so many improvements I > thought it was a good idea to just do it and fix things up by beta3 (I > hope). The question I was really asking was should I be adding skips to failing tests. At the moment I don't because they annoy me into doing something, but I should perhaps use something like jython -m test.regrtest -v | grep FIXME as my "thermometer". On a related issue, do you have some sort of named branch where you pull together 2.7b2 making it ok for us to push change sets as usual to default? Not that I know how to make such a branch, but I'm reminded of this on python-dev: https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132397.html Jeff |
From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2014-04-01 17:18:09
|
On Mar 31, 2014 1:08 PM, "Jeff Allen" <ja...@fa...> wrote: > > On 30/03/2014 17:22, fwi...@gm... wrote: >> >> >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> Should we have failing tests in (even) a beta release? I'd feel happier about inserting skips if I knew there was a "FIXME thermometer" somewhere that would move me to treat the underlying causes. >> I tagged b2 and tags are movable in hg - feel free to push changes. We'll get more formal for release candidates and releases (and maybe on future betas) >> We really shouldn't have failing tests in beta releases - but since it's been a year since beta1 and there are so many improvements I thought it was a good idea to just do it and fix things up by beta3 (I hope). -Frank |
From: <fwi...@gm...> - 2014-04-11 02:46:51
|
New soft launch here containing a patch from Jim that should fix the idna codec issue: Installer: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1011/org/python/jython-installer/2.7-b2/jython-installer-2.7-b2.jar<https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1008/org/python/jython-installer/2.7-b2/jython-installer-2.7-b2.jar> Standalone: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1012/org/python/jython-standalone/2.7-b2/jython-standalone-2.7-b2.jar<https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1009/org/python/jython-standalone/2.7-b2/jython-standalone-2.7-b2.jar> Raw jar: https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1013/org/python/jython/2.7-b2/jython-2.7-b2.jar<https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/orgpython-1010/org/python/jython/2.7-b2/jython-2.7-b2.jar> On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 10:17 AM, fwi...@gm... < fwi...@gm...> wrote: > > On Mar 31, 2014 1:08 PM, "Jeff Allen" <ja...@fa...> wrote: > > > > On 30/03/2014 17:22, fwi...@gm... wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 4:21 AM, Jeff Allen <ja...@fa...> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Should we have failing tests in (even) a beta release? I'd feel > happier about inserting skips if I knew there was a "FIXME thermometer" > somewhere that would move me to treat the underlying causes. > >> > I tagged b2 and tags are movable in hg - feel free to push changes. We'll > get more formal for release candidates and releases (and maybe on future > betas) > >> We really shouldn't have failing tests in beta releases - but since > it's been a year since beta1 and there are so many improvements I thought > it was a good idea to just do it and fix things up by beta3 (I hope). > > -Frank > |