From: Frank W. <fwi...@gm...> - 2005-10-19 13:27:27
|
Hi Stephan -- Thanks for the info. Given this -- is anyone reading this list up for looking into testing PyXML with the current build? Thanks, Frank On 10/18/05, Stefan Behnel <beh...@gk...> wrote: > > Hi! > > I saw a number of posts on the Jython-dev ML about bundling PyXML with > Jython. > AFAICT, PyXML/4DOM is pure Python (even using old-style classes) except > for > expat, the XML parser. But there is a fallback to a pure Python parser if > expat is not found. So I do not really see the issue with just bundling i= t > without the C extension. > > Hope it helps, > Stefan > |
From: Anand C. <str...@gm...> - 2005-10-19 15:07:57
|
There are three native extensions in PyXML. pyexpat, sgmlop and boolean. I could see a fall back for sgmlop in sgmllib.py can someone point me where should i look to find fallbacks for other libs. thanks, anand On Oct 19, 2005, at 6:57 PM, Frank Wierzbicki wrote: > Hi Stephan -- > > Thanks for the info. Given this -- is anyone reading this list up > for looking into testing PyXML with the current build? > > Thanks, > Frank > > On 10/18/05, Stefan Behnel <beh...@gk...rmatik.tu- > darmstadt.de> wrote: > Hi! > > I saw a number of posts on the Jython-dev ML about bundling PyXML > with Jython. > AFAICT, PyXML/4DOM is pure Python (even using old-style classes) > except for > expat, the XML parser. But there is a fallback to a pure Python > parser if > expat is not found. So I do not really see the issue with just > bundling it > without the C extension. > > Hope it helps, > Stefan > |