RE: [Junit-devel] Order in which test methods are run in a testcase

SourceForge Headquarters 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Try the extensions at http://gsbase.sourceforge.net/ - there is an
OrderedTestSuite among them.
=20
Hope this helps
Keith
=20

	-----Original Message-----
	From: jun...@li...
[mailto:jun...@li...] On Behalf Of Matthias
Schmidt
	Sent: 17 March 2006 17:05
	Cc: jun...@li...
	Subject: Re: [Junit-devel] Order in which test methods are run
in a testcase
=09
=09
	Virgil,
=09
	You cannot determine the order of execution of your test
methods. Why don't you share your import test code with us? Maybe we can
solve your dependency issue.
=09
	Another solution could look like this:
=09
	MyTestCase extends TestCase {
	    public static void myTestM1( ) [
	       ...
	    }
	   =20
	    ...
=09
	    public static void testAll( )  {
	       myTestM1( );
	       myTestM2( );
	    }
	}
=09
	Regards,
	Matt
=09
	Trasca Virgil wrote:=20

		    Hi,
	=09
		      is there a specified order in which JUnit runs
		the test methods from a TestCase. I have a TestCase in
		which I have testM1,testM2,testM3 written in the test
		case in this order. The order is VERY important for me
		as testM1 should be called before testM2, and testM2
		before testM3. I know that JUnit theory says that
		methods should be not dependend but in my practical
		situation I cannot avoid this.
	=09
		Thanks a lot,
		Virgil Trasca
	=09
		--- jun...@li... wrote:
	=09
		 =20

			Send Junit-devel mailing list submissions to
				jun...@li...
		=09
			To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide
Web,
			visit
		=09
		=09
			   =20

		https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
		 =20

			or, via email, send a message with subject or
body
			'help' to
=09
jun...@li...
		=09
			You can reach the person managing the list at
				jun...@li...
		=09
			When replying, please edit your Subject line so
it
			is more specific
			than "Re: Contents of Junit-devel digest..."
		=09
		=09
			Today's Topics:
		=09
			   1. SourceForge CVS (David Saff)
			   2. Re: AW: AW: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout
(David
			Saff)
			   3. CVS: junit/org/junit/runners
			Enclosed.java,1.3,1.4 (David Saff)
			   4. CVS: junit/org/junit/tests
			EnclosedTest.java,1.3,1.4
SortableTest.java,1.3,1.4
			Enclosed.java,1.1,NONE (David Saff)
			   5. CVS: junit README.html,1.13,1.14 (David
Saff)
			   6. CVS: junit build.xml,1.16,1.17 (David
Saff)
		=09
			--__--__--
		=09
			Message: 1
			Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:21:17 -0500
			From: David Saff <sa...@mi...>
<mailto:sa...@mi...>=20
			To: JUnit devel
<jun...@li...>
<mailto:jun...@li...>=20
			Subject: [Junit-devel] SourceForge CVS
		=09
			All,
		=09
			I've heard back from SourceForge.  Some quotes
from
			below:
		=09
			 >>>>>>
		=09
			Per the site status page:
		=09
			(  2006-03-13 12:42:16 - Project CVS Service )
As
			of
			2006-03-12 pserver (anonymous) CVS services,
along
			with
			tarballs and ViewCVS are down for projects that
			start with
			the letters e, i, j, o, v, w and x. We hope to
			resolve this
			issue in the next 2 days.
		=09
			Please keep an eye there for further updates to
this
			issue.
		=09
			[snip]
		=09
			However, the CVS issues we have been having are
			generally
			hardware related. We are working on swapping out
the
			hardware and attempting to isolate the causes,
but
			this
			takes time to do, and given the infrastructure
and
			volume of
			use, we'd prefer to keep it up, even if only
			limping, than
			take it down for a complete overhaul.
		=09
			<<<<<<
		=09
			It looks like our options are to sit and wait,
or
			change the name of the=20
			project to UnitJ.  No guarantees were made about
			subversion speed, so if=20
			we decided to change to SVN, it would not
			necessarily be for long-term=20
			reliability.  Thanks,
		=09
			    David Saff
		=09
			-------- Original Message --------
			Subject: 	[ alexandria-Support
Requests-1450494 ]
			CVS services issue
			Date: 	Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:28:55 -0800
			From: 	SourceForge.net
<no...@so...> <mailto:no...@so...>=20
			To: 	no...@so...
		=09
		=09
		=09
			Support Requests item #1450494, was opened at
			2006-03-15 11:14
			Message generated for change (Comment added)
made by
			burley
			You can respond by visiting:=20
		=09
			   =20

=09
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=3Ddetail&atid=3D200001&aid=3D145049=
4&gro
up_id=3D1
		 =20

			Please note that this message will contain a
full
			copy of the comment thread,
			including the initial issue submission, for this
			request,
			not just the latest update.
			Category: Project CVS Services
			Group: None
			   =20

				Status: Closed
				     =20

			Priority: 5
			Submitted By: David Saff (dsaff)
			   =20

				Assigned to: David Burley (burley)
				Summary: CVS services issue
				     =20

			Initial Comment:
			Dear SourceForge,
		=09
			Over the last few months, public anonymous
access to
			JUnit CVS has become so slow and unreliable that
it
			has
			slowed the pace at which we are able to accept
			patches
			and support early adopters.  Is there anything
we or
			you can do to solve this problem?  Are the
			subversion
			servers faster?  Will the subversion servers
stay
			fast
			if many people switch over?
		=09
			Below is a sampling of independent mailing list
			messages indicating the kinds of problems seen.=20
			Thanks,
		=09
			   David Saff
		=09
			2006/03/15: "I attempted to check out the
current
			CVS
			HEAD, but the system was unresponsive."
		=09
			2006/03/14: "I will send Javadoc updates for the
			classes as soon as cvs.sourceforge.net stops
timing
			out
			:-(. It usually works when America is asleep (in
the
			morning over here) ...."
		=09
			2006/03/08: "is it just me or do you guys also
get
			lots
			of timeouts when trying to synchronize with the
			sourceforge cvs?"
		=09
			2005/10/24: "I have found the SourceForge CVS
server
			_extremely_ sluggish and unreliable."
		=09
			2005/09/14: "I get varying errors depending on
the
			client,
			but they seem to all be related to
			either the CVS server timing out or the
connection
			being refused."
		=09
		=09
			   =20

=09
----------------------------------------------------------------------
		 =20

				Comment By: David Burley (burley)
				     =20

			Date: 2006-03-16 09:28
		=09
			Message:
			Logged In: YES=20
			user_id=3D597273
		=09
			Greetings,
		=09
			Per the site status page:
		=09
			(  2006-03-13 12:42:16 - Project CVS Service )
As
			of
			2006-03-12 pserver (anonymous) CVS services,
along
			with
			tarballs and ViewCVS are down for projects that
			start with
			the letters e, i, j, o, v, w and x. We hope to
			resolve this
			issue in the next 2 days.
		=09
			Please keep an eye there for further updates to
this
			issue.
		=09
			Regarding SVN, I am not sure even the SVN
developers
			themselves can answer that question. I am not
aware
			of a SVN
			installation with a potential to grow as large
as
			the one we
			are hosting is. While we have gone to great
lengths
			to
			ensure its scalable and do not believe there
will be
			issues
			with it (SVN is much easier to scale than CVS),
only
			time
			will tell.
		=09
			Regarding performance, CVS is actually faster.
			There's=20
			   =20

		=3D=3D=3D message truncated =3D=3D=3D
	=09
	=09
	=09
		-------------------------------------------------------
		This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking
scripting language
		that extends applications into web and mobile media.
Attend the live webcast
		and join the prime developer group breaking into this
new coding territory!
=09
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D=
121642
		_______________________________________________
		Junit-devel mailing list
		Jun...@li...
		https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
	=09
	=09
		 =20