Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Junit-devel] Order in which test methods are run in a testcase
|
From: Matthias S. <mat...@gm...> - 2006-03-17 17:04:46
|
Virgil,
You cannot determine the order of execution of your test methods. Why
don't you share your import test code with us? Maybe we can solve your
dependency issue.
Another solution could look like this:
MyTestCase extends TestCase {
public static void myTestM1( ) [
...
}
...
public static void testAll( ) {
myTestM1( );
myTestM2( );
}
}
Regards,
Matt
Trasca Virgil wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a specified order in which JUnit runs
> the test methods from a TestCase. I have a TestCase in
> which I have testM1,testM2,testM3 written in the test
> case in this order. The order is VERY important for me
> as testM1 should be called before testM2, and testM2
> before testM3. I know that JUnit theory says that
> methods should be not dependend but in my practical
> situation I cannot avoid this.
>
> Thanks a lot,
> Virgil Trasca
>
> --- jun...@li... wrote:
>
>
>> Send Junit-devel mailing list submissions to
>> jun...@li...
>>
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
>> visit
>>
>>
>>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
>
>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
>> 'help' to
>> jun...@li...
>>
>> You can reach the person managing the list at
>> jun...@li...
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
>> is more specific
>> than "Re: Contents of Junit-devel digest..."
>>
>>
>> Today's Topics:
>>
>> 1. SourceForge CVS (David Saff)
>> 2. Re: AW: AW: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout (David
>> Saff)
>> 3. CVS: junit/org/junit/runners
>> Enclosed.java,1.3,1.4 (David Saff)
>> 4. CVS: junit/org/junit/tests
>> EnclosedTest.java,1.3,1.4 SortableTest.java,1.3,1.4
>> Enclosed.java,1.1,NONE (David Saff)
>> 5. CVS: junit README.html,1.13,1.14 (David Saff)
>> 6. CVS: junit build.xml,1.16,1.17 (David Saff)
>>
>> --__--__--
>>
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:21:17 -0500
>> From: David Saff <sa...@mi...>
>> To: JUnit devel <jun...@li...>
>> Subject: [Junit-devel] SourceForge CVS
>>
>> All,
>>
>> I've heard back from SourceForge. Some quotes from
>> below:
>>
>> >>>>>>
>>
>> Per the site status page:
>>
>> ( 2006-03-13 12:42:16 - Project CVS Service ) As
>> of
>> 2006-03-12 pserver (anonymous) CVS services, along
>> with
>> tarballs and ViewCVS are down for projects that
>> start with
>> the letters e, i, j, o, v, w and x. We hope to
>> resolve this
>> issue in the next 2 days.
>>
>> Please keep an eye there for further updates to this
>> issue.
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> However, the CVS issues we have been having are
>> generally
>> hardware related. We are working on swapping out the
>> hardware and attempting to isolate the causes, but
>> this
>> takes time to do, and given the infrastructure and
>> volume of
>> use, we'd prefer to keep it up, even if only
>> limping, than
>> take it down for a complete overhaul.
>>
>> <<<<<<
>>
>> It looks like our options are to sit and wait, or
>> change the name of the
>> project to UnitJ. No guarantees were made about
>> subversion speed, so if
>> we decided to change to SVN, it would not
>> necessarily be for long-term
>> reliability. Thanks,
>>
>> David Saff
>>
>> -------- Original Message --------
>> Subject: [ alexandria-Support Requests-1450494 ]
>> CVS services issue
>> Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:28:55 -0800
>> From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...>
>> To: no...@so...
>>
>>
>>
>> Support Requests item #1450494, was opened at
>> 2006-03-15 11:14
>> Message generated for change (Comment added) made by
>> burley
>> You can respond by visiting:
>>
>>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=200001&aid=1450494&group_id=1
>
>> Please note that this message will contain a full
>> copy of the comment thread,
>> including the initial issue submission, for this
>> request,
>> not just the latest update.
>> Category: Project CVS Services
>> Group: None
>>
>>> Status: Closed
>>>
>> Priority: 5
>> Submitted By: David Saff (dsaff)
>>
>>> Assigned to: David Burley (burley)
>>> Summary: CVS services issue
>>>
>> Initial Comment:
>> Dear SourceForge,
>>
>> Over the last few months, public anonymous access to
>> JUnit CVS has become so slow and unreliable that it
>> has
>> slowed the pace at which we are able to accept
>> patches
>> and support early adopters. Is there anything we or
>> you can do to solve this problem? Are the
>> subversion
>> servers faster? Will the subversion servers stay
>> fast
>> if many people switch over?
>>
>> Below is a sampling of independent mailing list
>> messages indicating the kinds of problems seen.
>> Thanks,
>>
>> David Saff
>>
>> 2006/03/15: "I attempted to check out the current
>> CVS
>> HEAD, but the system was unresponsive."
>>
>> 2006/03/14: "I will send Javadoc updates for the
>> classes as soon as cvs.sourceforge.net stops timing
>> out
>> :-(. It usually works when America is asleep (in the
>> morning over here) ...."
>>
>> 2006/03/08: "is it just me or do you guys also get
>> lots
>> of timeouts when trying to synchronize with the
>> sourceforge cvs?"
>>
>> 2005/10/24: "I have found the SourceForge CVS server
>> _extremely_ sluggish and unreliable."
>>
>> 2005/09/14: "I get varying errors depending on the
>> client,
>> but they seem to all be related to
>> either the CVS server timing out or the connection
>> being refused."
>>
>>
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>> Comment By: David Burley (burley)
>>>
>> Date: 2006-03-16 09:28
>>
>> Message:
>> Logged In: YES
>> user_id=597273
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Per the site status page:
>>
>> ( 2006-03-13 12:42:16 - Project CVS Service ) As
>> of
>> 2006-03-12 pserver (anonymous) CVS services, along
>> with
>> tarballs and ViewCVS are down for projects that
>> start with
>> the letters e, i, j, o, v, w and x. We hope to
>> resolve this
>> issue in the next 2 days.
>>
>> Please keep an eye there for further updates to this
>> issue.
>>
>> Regarding SVN, I am not sure even the SVN developers
>> themselves can answer that question. I am not aware
>> of a SVN
>> installation with a potential to grow as large as
>> the one we
>> are hosting is. While we have gone to great lengths
>> to
>> ensure its scalable and do not believe there will be
>> issues
>> with it (SVN is much easier to scale than CVS), only
>> time
>> will tell.
>>
>> Regarding performance, CVS is actually faster.
>> There's
>>
> === message truncated ===
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
> that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
> and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
> http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
> _______________________________________________
> Junit-devel mailing list
> Jun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
>
>
>
|
