From: <Mat...@un...> - 2006-03-17 08:49:12
|
Still no change, is there? I haven't been able to synchronize with cvs = since sunday .... ________________________________ Von: jun...@li... im Auftrag von David Saff Gesendet: Do 16.03.2006 19:21 An: JUnit devel Betreff: [Junit-devel] SourceForge CVS All, I've heard back from SourceForge. Some quotes from below: >>>>>> Per the site status page: ( 2006-03-13 12:42:16 - Project CVS Service ) As of 2006-03-12 pserver (anonymous) CVS services, along with tarballs and ViewCVS are down for projects that start with the letters e, i, j, o, v, w and x. We hope to resolve this issue in the next 2 days. Please keep an eye there for further updates to this issue. [snip] However, the CVS issues we have been having are generally hardware related. We are working on swapping out the hardware and attempting to isolate the causes, but this takes time to do, and given the infrastructure and volume of use, we'd prefer to keep it up, even if only limping, than take it down for a complete overhaul. <<<<<< It looks like our options are to sit and wait, or change the name of the project to UnitJ. No guarantees were made about subversion speed, so if we decided to change to SVN, it would not necessarily be for long-term reliability. Thanks, David Saff -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ alexandria-Support Requests-1450494 ] CVS services = issue Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:28:55 -0800 From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> To: no...@so... Support Requests item #1450494, was opened at 2006-03-15 11:14 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by burley You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=3Ddetail&atid=3D200001&aid=3D145049= 4&group_id=3D1 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment = thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Project CVS Services Group: None >Status: Closed Priority: 5 Submitted By: David Saff (dsaff) >Assigned to: David Burley (burley) >Summary: CVS services issue Initial Comment: Dear SourceForge, Over the last few months, public anonymous access to JUnit CVS has become so slow and unreliable that it has slowed the pace at which we are able to accept patches and support early adopters. Is there anything we or you can do to solve this problem? Are the subversion servers faster? Will the subversion servers stay fast if many people switch over? Below is a sampling of independent mailing list messages indicating the kinds of problems seen. Thanks, David Saff 2006/03/15: "I attempted to check out the current CVS HEAD, but the system was unresponsive." 2006/03/14: "I will send Javadoc updates for the classes as soon as cvs.sourceforge.net stops timing out :-(. It usually works when America is asleep (in the morning over here) ...." 2006/03/08: "is it just me or do you guys also get lots of timeouts when trying to synchronize with the sourceforge cvs?" 2005/10/24: "I have found the SourceForge CVS server _extremely_ sluggish and unreliable." 2005/09/14: "I get varying errors depending on the client, but they seem to all be related to either the CVS server timing out or the connection being refused." ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: David Burley (burley) Date: 2006-03-16 09:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3D597273 Greetings, Per the site status page: ( 2006-03-13 12:42:16 - Project CVS Service ) As of 2006-03-12 pserver (anonymous) CVS services, along with tarballs and ViewCVS are down for projects that start with the letters e, i, j, o, v, w and x. We hope to resolve this issue in the next 2 days. Please keep an eye there for further updates to this issue. Regarding SVN, I am not sure even the SVN developers themselves can answer that question. I am not aware of a SVN installation with a potential to grow as large as the one we are hosting is. While we have gone to great lengths to ensure its scalable and do not believe there will be issues with it (SVN is much easier to scale than CVS), only time will tell. Regarding performance, CVS is actually faster. There's less overhead in a CVS operation than there is in a SVN operation, but, our SVN offering has been more stable of late, so that may be reason enough to consider it. However, the CVS issues we have been having are generally hardware related. We are working on swapping out the hardware and attempting to isolate the causes, but this takes time to do, and given the infrastructure and volume of use, we'd prefer to keep it up, even if only limping, than take it down for a complete overhaul. We know these issues have been around for a long time, and we have been working an equally long amount of time to fix them. We think we'll be over the hump shortly and CVS performance will go back to expected levels then. Thank you, David Burley Quality of Service Analyst, SourceForge.net ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: David Saff (dsaff) Date: 2006-03-15 11:55 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=3D325156 An interesting recent development: Yes. I can observe it right now. If I attempt to log in to an arbitrary SourceForge project cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/ant-contrib I get an immediate completion after hitting enter on the password. If I change it to: cvs -d:pserver:ano...@cv...:/cvsroot/junit I get "Unrecognized auth response from cvs.sourceforge.net: M PserverBackend: PserverBackend() Connect (Connection Timed Out)". Could this be a problem only with JUnit's repository? Thanks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=3Ddetail&atid=3D200001&aid=3D145049= 4&group_id=3D1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting = language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live = webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding = territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Junit-devel mailing list Jun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel |