Re: AW: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout

[J. D. B. <jd...@ge...>]

I'm using IDEA, which comes with JavaSVN.  I'm happy with it.  Two 
Eclipse plugins also use JavaSVN, but I haven't tried them and don't 
know how well integrated they are.

Cheers,
11011011

<Mat...@un...> wrote on 03/12/2006 09:55:00 PM:
> Of course, subversion is better. Wouldn't it be great to switch JUnit to subversion?
>
> Btw: What client are you using? I heard, that the Eclipse clients are not that good at the moment.
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: jun...@li... [mailto:jun...@li...] Im Auftrag von J. David Beutel
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. März 2006 23:47
> An: jun...@li...
> Betreff: Re: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout
>
> I've had the same problem, and better luck with SourceForge's anonymous 
> Subversion (so far, anyway).  Also, I prefer Subversion.
>
> Cheers,
> 11011011
>
> David Saff <sa...@mi...> wrote on 03/08/2006 08:37:41 AM:
>   
>> Matt,
>>
>> Anonymous pserver CVS access to SourceForge is absolutely terrible.  
>> Committers get CVS/SSH access, which is reasonably fast, so the people 
>> to whom SourceForge is most likely to listen are least likely to 
>> complain.  I actually ended up setting up a daemon that tried to 
>> update every hour, so that when I sat down to develop, there was a 
>> good chance that I had an up-to-date version.  Of course, this just 
>> contributed to everyone else's traffic, so there's probably a better 
>> solution somewhere.
>>
>> Sorry,
>>
>>    David Saff
>>
>> Mat...@un... wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi *.*,
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> is it just me or do you guys also get lots of timeouts when trying to 
>>> synchronize with the sourceforge cvs?