AW: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout

[<Mat...@un...>]

Of course, subversion is better. Wouldn't it be great to switch JUnit to =
subversion?

Btw: What client are you using? I heard, that the Eclipse clients are =
not that good at the moment.

-----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
Von: jun...@li... =
[mailto:jun...@li...] Im Auftrag von J. David =
Beutel
Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. M=E4rz 2006 23:47
An: jun...@li...
Betreff: Re: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout

I've had the same problem, and better luck with SourceForge's anonymous=20
Subversion (so far, anyway).  Also, I prefer Subversion.

Cheers,
11011011

David Saff <sa...@mi...> wrote on 03/08/2006 08:37:41 AM:
> Matt,
>
> Anonymous pserver CVS access to SourceForge is absolutely terrible. =20
> Committers get CVS/SSH access, which is reasonably fast, so the people =

> to whom SourceForge is most likely to listen are least likely to=20
> complain.  I actually ended up setting up a daemon that tried to=20
> update every hour, so that when I sat down to develop, there was a=20
> good chance that I had an up-to-date version.  Of course, this just=20
> contributed to everyone else's traffic, so there's probably a better=20
> solution somewhere.
>
> Sorry,
>
>    David Saff
>
> Mat...@un... wrote:
>>
>> Hi *.*,
>>
>> =20
>>
>> is it just me or do you guys also get lots of timeouts when trying to =

>> synchronize with the sourceforge cvs?
>



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting =
language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live =
webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding =
territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D=
121642
_______________________________________________
Junit-devel mailing list
Jun...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel