Re: [Junit-devel] DataPoint bug: record 2191102 on SourceForge tracker

[David S. <da...@sa...>]

Amanda,

I think it's best to require @DataPoint, but we've been vague in the past.
Some of the self-tests may need updating.

Were there unit test failures before you started?

Let's go ahead with two separate patches.

   David Saff

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Amanda Robinson <ama...@gm...
> wrote:

> I'm taking a look at the bug pasted below, in which not only
> @DataPoint-annotated fields but all static fields in a
> @RunWith(Theories.class) class are used as potential arguments for
> @Theory methods.
>
> Is it correct that only fields with @DataPoint annotations should be
> used? When I tried implementing a fix, all of a sudden there were
> twice as many unit test failures overall. It looks like many of the
> unit tests do not use the @DataPoint annotation for all fields they
> expect to use in Theory methods.
>
> I've got a fix ready for bug 2196462, @Theory annotation optional when
> running with Theories. Can I submit one patch to fix both that and
> this bug, or is it best if I submit two separate patches?
>
> Thanks,
> ~Amanda
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you.  Join us at MIX09 to help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Junit-devel mailing list
> Jun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
>