Mostly right, except that a @Test method with parameters should be flagged
as invalid. Thanks for looking into this,
David Saff
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:58 PM, Amanda Robinson <ama...@gm...
> wrote:
> The bug pasted below, @Theory annotation optional when running with
> Theories, is currently unassigned. As long as nobody takes issue, I'm
> going to dig into this a bit and hope to submit a patch soon. It
> appears related to [ 2191102 ] AllMembersSupplier should only add
> @DataPoint fields, so I may look into that bug as well.
>
> It appears that correct behavior is as follows:
> - within a class annotated with @RunWith(Theories.class):
> - any method annotated with @Theory should test all input
> annotated with @DataPoint
> - any method annotated with @Test should run as a standard test and
> ignore
>
> Is this correct? If not, what is correct expected behavior?
>
> Thanks,
> ~Amanda
>
>
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2196462&group_id=15278&atid=115278
>
> Summary: (?)
> @Theory annotation optional when running with Theories Private: (?)
> No
> The implementation of
> org.junit.experimental.theories.Theories's computeTestMethods incorrectly
> leaves @Test methods as @Theory methods.
>
> The following code:
> @RunWith(Theories.class)
> public class FooTest {
> public static int VALUE=1;
> @Test
> public void bar(int i) {
> System.out.println("bar:" +i);
>
> }
> }
>
> Produces the result: bar:1
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
> The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
> pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
>
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
> _______________________________________________
> Junit-devel mailing list
> Jun...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel
>
|
