From: J. D. B. <jd...@ge...> - 2007-08-27 21:04:34
|
Is anyone working on an antlib for JUnit? The support for JUnit 4 in Ant 1.7 is OK, but could stand some improvements in the reporting, e.g., for @Ignore, the 4.4 assumptions, the way it continues to simulate the distinction between failure and error, and a timezone for the timestamps. Cheers, 11011011 |
From: David S. <sa...@mi...> - 2007-08-29 20:55:57
|
David, I don't know of anyone working on such a thing, but it would likely be valuable. Would you like to give it a whirl? Thanks, David Saff On 8/27/07, J. David Beutel <jd...@ge...> wrote: > Is anyone working on an antlib for JUnit? The support for JUnit 4 in > Ant 1.7 is OK, but could stand some improvements in the reporting, e.g., > for @Ignore, the 4.4 assumptions, the way it continues to simulate the > distinction between failure and error, and a timezone for the timestamps. > > Cheers, > 11011011 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Junit-devel mailing list > Jun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel > |
From: J. D. B. <jd...@ge...> - 2007-08-30 09:15:39
|
Thanks, I would like to take a shot at it, or at least see how far I can get. It should include the junit and junitreport tasks. It could be distributed separately from both, but if I'm not mistaken about antlib, it could also be distributed in the same JAR as JUnit. This makes me wonder, is JUnit's CPL 1.0 compatible with Ant's Apache License 2.0? Speaking of all-in-one, I noticed that Hamcrest distributes its source and class files together in the same JAR. I'd never seen that before, but I like not having separate files that can get out of sync. Cheers, 11011011 David Saff wrote: > David, > > I don't know of anyone working on such a thing, but it would likely be > valuable. Would you like to give it a whirl? Thanks, > > David Saff > > On 8/27/07, J. David Beutel <jd...@ge...> wrote: > >> Is anyone working on an antlib for JUnit? The support for JUnit 4 in >> Ant 1.7 is OK, but could stand some improvements in the reporting, e.g., >> for @Ignore, the 4.4 assumptions, the way it continues to simulate the >> distinction between failure and error, and a timezone for the timestamps. >> >> Cheers, >> 11011011 |
From: J. D. B. <jd...@ge...> - 2007-08-30 19:20:52
|
J. David Beutel wrote: > is JUnit's CPL 1.0 compatible with Ant's Apache License 2.0? > I am not a lawyer, but to answer my own question, I don't see any problem. CPL 1.0 says: Contributions do not include additions to the Program which: (i) are separate modules of software distributed in conjunction with the Program under their own license agreement, and (ii) are not derivative works of the Program. and Apache 2.0 says: For the purposes of this License, Derivative Works shall not include works that remain separable from, or merely link (or bind by name) to the interfaces of, the Work and Derivative Works thereof. So I suppose that code under these respective licenses can call, implement, or extend each other, and be distributed together, without any virulence of the kind intended by the GPL. Cheers, 11011011 |