From: <Mat...@un...> - 2006-03-13 07:51:20
|
Of course, subversion is better. Wouldn't it be great to switch JUnit to = subversion? Btw: What client are you using? I heard, that the Eclipse clients are = not that good at the moment. -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: jun...@li... = [mailto:jun...@li...] Im Auftrag von J. David = Beutel Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. M=E4rz 2006 23:47 An: jun...@li... Betreff: Re: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout I've had the same problem, and better luck with SourceForge's anonymous=20 Subversion (so far, anyway). Also, I prefer Subversion. Cheers, 11011011 David Saff <sa...@mi...> wrote on 03/08/2006 08:37:41 AM: > Matt, > > Anonymous pserver CVS access to SourceForge is absolutely terrible. =20 > Committers get CVS/SSH access, which is reasonably fast, so the people = > to whom SourceForge is most likely to listen are least likely to=20 > complain. I actually ended up setting up a daemon that tried to=20 > update every hour, so that when I sat down to develop, there was a=20 > good chance that I had an up-to-date version. Of course, this just=20 > contributed to everyone else's traffic, so there's probably a better=20 > solution somewhere. > > Sorry, > > David Saff > > Mat...@un... wrote: >> >> Hi *.*, >> >> =20 >> >> is it just me or do you guys also get lots of timeouts when trying to = >> synchronize with the sourceforge cvs? > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting = language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live = webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding = territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D110944&bid=3D241720&dat=3D= 121642 _______________________________________________ Junit-devel mailing list Jun...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel |
From: J. D. B. <jd...@ge...> - 2006-03-13 08:11:04
|
I'm using IDEA, which comes with JavaSVN. I'm happy with it. Two Eclipse plugins also use JavaSVN, but I haven't tried them and don't know how well integrated they are. Cheers, 11011011 <Mat...@un...> wrote on 03/12/2006 09:55:00 PM: > Of course, subversion is better. Wouldn't it be great to switch JUnit to subversion? > > Btw: What client are you using? I heard, that the Eclipse clients are not that good at the moment. > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: jun...@li... [mailto:jun...@li...] Im Auftrag von J. David Beutel > Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. März 2006 23:47 > An: jun...@li... > Betreff: Re: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout > > I've had the same problem, and better luck with SourceForge's anonymous > Subversion (so far, anyway). Also, I prefer Subversion. > > Cheers, > 11011011 > > David Saff <sa...@mi...> wrote on 03/08/2006 08:37:41 AM: > >> Matt, >> >> Anonymous pserver CVS access to SourceForge is absolutely terrible. >> Committers get CVS/SSH access, which is reasonably fast, so the people >> to whom SourceForge is most likely to listen are least likely to >> complain. I actually ended up setting up a daemon that tried to >> update every hour, so that when I sat down to develop, there was a >> good chance that I had an up-to-date version. Of course, this just >> contributed to everyone else's traffic, so there's probably a better >> solution somewhere. >> >> Sorry, >> >> David Saff >> >> Mat...@un... wrote: >> >>> Hi *.*, >>> >>> >>> >>> is it just me or do you guys also get lots of timeouts when trying to >>> synchronize with the sourceforge cvs? |
From: David S. <sa...@mi...> - 2006-03-13 12:55:36
|
I've used subclipse, and it was just barely tolerable--I often ended up dropping to the command line to do commits and merges. I downloaded subversive last night, and I'll give it a go for a while. If it works well, then I'd be more than happy to see a move to subversion. Kent, Erich, your thoughts? David J. David Beutel wrote: > I'm using IDEA, which comes with JavaSVN. I'm happy with it. Two > Eclipse plugins also use JavaSVN, but I haven't tried them and don't > know how well integrated they are. > > Cheers, > 11011011 > > <Mat...@un...> wrote on 03/12/2006 09:55:00 PM: >> Of course, subversion is better. Wouldn't it be great to switch JUnit >> to subversion? >> >> Btw: What client are you using? I heard, that the Eclipse clients are >> not that good at the moment. >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: jun...@li... >> [mailto:jun...@li...] Im Auftrag von J. >> David Beutel >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 12. März 2006 23:47 >> An: jun...@li... >> Betreff: Re: [Junit-devel] cvs-timeout >> >> I've had the same problem, and better luck with SourceForge's >> anonymous Subversion (so far, anyway). Also, I prefer Subversion. >> >> Cheers, >> 11011011 >> >> David Saff <sa...@mi...> wrote on 03/08/2006 08:37:41 AM: >> >>> Matt, >>> >>> Anonymous pserver CVS access to SourceForge is absolutely terrible. >>> Committers get CVS/SSH access, which is reasonably fast, so the >>> people to whom SourceForge is most likely to listen are least likely >>> to complain. I actually ended up setting up a daemon that tried to >>> update every hour, so that when I sat down to develop, there was a >>> good chance that I had an up-to-date version. Of course, this just >>> contributed to everyone else's traffic, so there's probably a better >>> solution somewhere. >>> >>> Sorry, >>> >>> David Saff >>> >>> Mat...@un... wrote: >>> >>>> Hi *.*, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> is it just me or do you guys also get lots of timeouts when trying >>>> to synchronize with the sourceforge cvs? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Junit-devel mailing list > Jun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/junit-devel |