From: Joshua O'M. <jos...@gm...> - 2009-10-03 21:52:20
|
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Jierui XIE <jie...@gm...> wrote: > I have a few questions about the betweenness: > 1. To date, does JUNG2.0 provides betweenness with weighted edges? There's an experimental version in algorithms.scoring that is not yet validated. Use at your own risk. > 2. does JUNG2.0 provides methods for returning the ranking positions? No. It provides a score for each vertex. If you want the ranks, sort the vertices by score. > 3. What does this "ranker.setRemoveRankScoresOnFinalize()" do? > sometimes it is true, sometimes it is false.I am confused. It's an artifact of JUNG 1.x design, which many people found confusing and is one reason why the algorithms.importance code got refactored into what's in algorithms.scoring. If you don't use JUNG 1.x, and don't use the algorithms in algorithms.importance, then you don't need to worry about it. Joshua > > Thanks > -------------- > Jerry > 2009-10-03 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Jung-support mailing list > Jun...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jung-support > -- jos...@gm......................www.ics.uci.edu/~jmadden Joshua O'Madadhain: Information Scientist, Musician, Philosopher-At-Tall It's that moment of dawning comprehension that I live for. -- Bill Watterson My opinions are too rational and insightful to be those of any organization. |