From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2009-06-25 19:49:56
|
Read and respond to this message at: https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=7464238 By: bdg146 I have some questions regarding JUNG's implementation of eigenvector centrality. According to some documentation I've found, the eigenvector centrality of Xi is defined as the ith entry in the eigenvector corresponding to the largest eigenvalue (as computed from the adjacency matrix). This results in values inconsistent with JUNG's output. Eigenvector centrality also has the following property: EigenvectorCentrality(Xi) = (1/λ) * sum(EigenvectorCentrality(neighbors_of_Xi)), λ = the largest eigenvalue This property holds true for the eigenvector implementation, but does not hold true for JUNGs implementation. For example, use the following undirected graph: Nodes: N1, N2, ..., N11 Edges: (N1, N2) (N1, N3) (N1, N4) (N1, N5) (N1, N6) (N1, N7) (N1, N8) (N8, N9) (N8, N10) (N8, N11) According to JUNG, the eigenvector centrality of N1 is the equal to the eigenvector centrality of N8. The same does not hold true for the eigenvalue/vector implementation. What's going on here? Am I misinterpreting something or using JUNG incorrectly? Are there multiple interpretations of this metric? Thanks for the help! ______________________________________________________________________ You are receiving this email because you elected to monitor this forum. To stop monitoring this forum, login to SourceForge.net and visit: https://sourceforge.net/forum/unmonitor.php?forum_id=252062 |