Re: [JPP-Devel] New Attribute View

[Sunburned S. <sun...@gm...>]

Paul,

I believe that the Java package structure that you mentioned for your
code follows the informal convention that we have been using.

The Sunburned Surveyor

On 6/7/07, Paul Austin <mai...@re...> wrote:
> I'm going to start putting together a CVS diff for the new Attribute
> view and am trying to decide the best packages to put my code, here are
> my thoughts.
>
> 1. Infrastructure required so that I can add a new tab to the InfoFrame
> will go under com.vividsolutions.jump.*
> 2. The new view pane itself will go under org.openjump.*
> 3. The new HTML renderer registry will go under org.openjump.*
>
> The reason for the above split is that the new frameworks are being
> managed under the OpenJump project so I'll put my re-usable components
> under there and I'll only make changes to the Vivid code to add new
> extension points.
>
> I'm going to make another post to discuss the approach I should follow
> to add extension points to existing components.
>
> Paul
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jum...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>