Menu

#2 Build with make

v0.1
open
5
2003-06-28
2003-04-18
Dave Blau
No

The ANT build environment needs to be replaced with a
GNU make build environment. The reasons are licensing,
ubiquity, and fewer developer installation requirements.

Discussion

  • Dave Blau

    Dave Blau - 2003-04-18
    • priority: 5 --> 7
     
  • Dave Blau

    Dave Blau - 2003-04-18
    • priority: 7 --> 5
     
  • Daniel Atallah

    Daniel Atallah - 2003-06-27

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=325843

    i'd be curious to hear more about the reasoning for prefering
    make. My personal experience has been that ant is a far
    superior build tool than make for Java processes. I
    understand the developer installation issue, but what serious
    Java developer doesn't already use ant?

    I don't want this to sound like a complaint... i'm just trying to
    get the big picture here.

     
  • Dave Blau

    Dave Blau - 2003-06-28
    • assigned_to: nobody --> flickboy
     
  • Dave Blau

    Dave Blau - 2003-06-28

    Logged In: YES
    user_id=116518

    After doing research into the licensing issue, it seems that
    the license on the build environment doesn't affect the
    license on the code. I'm not suggesting that everyone go out
    and buy JBuilder, but I don't want to force people to use
    Eclipse either. The goal is for the majority of developers
    to have easy access to a powerful build environment. I know
    for a fact that make ships with all Unix-like operating
    systems, but ANT doesn't. Of course, it might be a
    reasonable concession to force developers to use ANT, since
    as you say most of them are already using it. I'll give the
    issue some more thought.

     

Log in to post a comment.

MongoDB Logo MongoDB