|
From: Fausto L. <fau...@ho...> - 2005-12-01 09:56:45
|
Hi all, The lastest release of JTestCase was important in my eyes mainly for a specific feature: it got rid of most of all junit dependence that was still lurking around. JUnit is known to have some design flaws, as you can read, for example, here: http://www.beust.com/weblog/archives/000082.html Even Charley, who is writing in the forum, has admittedly said that his company developed a testing frawork (based on jtestcase) that "tried to cope with some junit deficiences" Now for the matter of this email: the class ForTestCase has some direct junit imports and even extends a junit TestCase. Instead I would like to build jtestcase even without importing junit jar !! So I am thinking about to deprecate that class in the future release. Of course, if someone can port it to a non junit dependend form, i'll be the happiest person on the earth (well, maybe amongst the happiest..) I really don't like to boss like this on other's work, but I think this a very profound and meaning point. On the other hand, i'm trying to integrate jtestcase in testng, http://testng.org/doc/, which is a new testing framework that claims to resolve most of junit limitations. The first result seems encouraging. Phew, i said it all.... Let me know what you think. Greetings, Fausto _________________________________________________________________ 250MB per la tua casella di posta http://www.msn.it/hotmail/minisite_10 Trova immediatamente qualsiasi tipo di file. |