From: Erik H. <er...@eh...> - 2021-09-21 06:44:17
|
Hi, On 9/20/21 11:53 PM, Karimi, Soroush wrote: > Hi, > > I hope you are all having a good day. I’m Soroush Karimi and a PhD > student at the university of Tulsa. We are a team of researchers doing > research on aircraft control systems and ground collision avoidance > systems. We are using JSBSIM in python to create our simulations. Thank > you so much for all the effort you’ve put into JSBSIM, It is really > astonishing. > > We are trying to develop models on top of JSBSIM and share it so other > researchers can also benefit from our work. I would really appreciate > your feedback on the topics below so we can get a clearer view of our > next steps. > > 1. Are there any current developments/upgrades to JSBSIM or any > roadmaps for future development available? > 2. How can we collaborate on the project? In terms of adding new > features, documentation or sample codes? > 3. Do you need help in any specific criteria in JSBSIM? Most of the development, including discussions, take place at githib these days: https://github.com/JSBSim-Team It would not have been my first choice but what can you do. In addition to what Bill described (DATCOM+ which is a really powerful tool) there is also AeromatiC++ which is a small command-line tool to create JSBSim configuration files from a small set of parameters. Of course this will never reach the accuracy of DATCOM+ but depending on your requirements it might be good enough. At least for a start: https://github.com/JSBSim-Team/aeromatic Erik -- http://www.adalin.com High performance audio scenegraph and sound simulation. |