From: Simon & J. <sim...@go...> - 2019-01-19 22:41:02
|
Hi Ron, My focus is on the practicalities of matching jsbsim piston results with actual known engine performance values. Initially matching a ordinary aspirated engine in a standard day static test. Then taking the same engine and boosting it with a supercharger or turbo charger and performing the same test. And finally testing at speed and ensuring that ram effect holds the MP to the tested results. On 19 January 2019, at 00:59, Ron Jensen <wi...@je...> wrote: On Friday 18 January 2019 01:50:01 pm Simon Julie Morley via Jsbsim-devel wrote: > Is there anyone willing to work with me and code on the piston engine ? > > I’m quite happy to provide the logic, maths etc...but the C++ is a step > too far for me. > > Regards > > Simon Simon, I've been lurking for the past few years because I'm working on a Bachelor of Science Degree in Applied Mathematics. It just so happens I was discussing the JSBSim piston engine model with one of my professors (PhD) this week with the idea of documenting it in a mathematical modeling paper. I'm approaching it with a fresh set of eyes and and newly honed appreciation of calculus, ODEs and math modeling skills. What is it you think needs to be changed, and why? Ron _______________________________________________ Jsbsim-devel mailing list Jsb...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jsbsim-devel _______________________________________________ The JSBSim Flight Dynamics Model project http://www.JSBSim.org _______________________________________________ |