|
From: gerard r. <gh...@gm...> - 2009-06-28 10:41:11
|
On vendredi 26 juin 2009, Jon S. Berndt wrote: > I think you are missing the point. Multiple FDMs would be designed to work > within Flightgear or standalone. Yes and .....NO :) How FG will be able to manage several multiple FDM ? OR, how the user/developper will be able to tell to FG which FDM must be in use ? I experienced recently ( before that last Erik update ) the problem. I got both /fdm/Jsbsim and /fdm/jsbsim[1] , the first one was stupid, anyhow, it gave some data to the main FG branch, the second one was right , it gave some others and most of the right values to the main FG branch. The result was a not working Aircraft. > The main model would always have the base > property tree names. I assume that any other capability or feature such as > nasal would not be affected. > Not with Nasal, the script could want a getprop from a jsbsim fdm property, in that case, which /fdm/jsbsim[?], 0, 1, 2 , 3 ......... ? We don't know........ since we can't control that incremental value. -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire |