Re: [Jsbsim-devel] Multiple property tree problem/soution

[Jon S. B. <jon...@co...>]

I think you are missing the point. Multiple FDMs would be designed to work within Flightgear or standalone. The main model would always have the base property tree names. I assume that any other capability or feature such as nasal would not be affected. 

-----Original Message-----
From: gerard robin <gh...@gm...>
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 4:29 PM
To: Development issues <jsb...@li...>
Subject: Re: [Jsbsim-devel] Multiple property tree problem/soution

On vendredi 26 juin 2009, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Jon S. Berndt wrote:
> >> I hope both solutions didn't cross each other and cause any troubles
> >> that way. I've added an update that only increases the counter when not
> >> running inside FlightGear.
> >
> > I saw that. I removed it temporarily to see if Ron's fix works for all
> > cases. Theoretically, multiple FDMs would be desirable in all
> > environments.
>
> Ok, lets see how it works out then.
>
> Erik
>

Erik
To me ,Your last FG CVS  update is right.

In any case with FG only one JSBSIM property tree  ( [0] ) , must be 
available, since there is a close relationship with FG Property tree itself, 
for instance the Engine CutOff.
And,  if we have to include some additional Nasal script the difficulty would 

[The entire original message is not included]