From: David C. <dav...@co...> - 2008-04-27 21:46:04
|
On Sunday 27 April 2008 07:13, Fabian Grodek wrote: > ... a more general algorithm would be to do the iterations with the > pitch-trim-cmd-norm. The user could then use this pitch-trim-cmd-norm in > the FCS block as input to either the elevator or to the horizontal > stabilizer, depending on his aerodynamic database buildup components and/or > aircraft flight control system. When I mentioned this a few years ago it was pointed out to me that the current system works fine, as long as you don't mind using property names to represent something that they don't exactly name. I also prefer pitch-trim-cmd-norm, but be advised that this will break all the existing model configurations and AeroMatic. Dave |