Re: [JPublish-developer] JBoss 3.0.0 console appender error
Brought to you by:
aeden
From: Ben A. <ben...@ac...> - 2002-06-21 02:02:16
|
In the end I edited the log.properties file in each .war and commented = out every entry. This fixed the problem, with JBoss' log4j = implementation now capturing all JPublish messages. Thanks to everyone for their responses. Ben ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Dmitri Colebatch=20 To: Anthony Eden ; jpu...@li...=20 Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 10:01 AM Subject: Re: [JPublish-developer] JBoss 3.0.0 console appender error yep - the easiest thing is to just change the log4j config to not use = the console. hth dim ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Anthony Eden=20 To: jpu...@li...=20 Sent: Thursday, June 20, 2002 12:23 AM Subject: RE: [JPublish-developer] JBoss 3.0.0 console appender error I have heard others mention this problem before: it has to do with = Log4J initializing twice. Check the mailing list archives because I = believe someone does have a patch although I do not recall if they = actually posted the patch to the list. If someone comes up with a clean workaround for this I will make the = necessary changes. The best thing would be to determine from Log4J = whether or not it is already initialized, right? I will look into it = personally as well. Sincerely, Anthony Eden -----Original Message----- From: jpu...@li... = [mailto:jpu...@li...]On Behalf Of Ben = Alex Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2002 6:33 AM To: jpu...@li... Subject: [JPublish-developer] JBoss 3.0.0 console appender error Hi When I deploy the jpublish-docs.war shipped with JPublish 1.0b3 to = JBoss 3.0.0 with integrated Jetty, I receive the following message on = the JBoss console: 17:07:26,786 INFO [Jetty] jpublish: init ERROR: invalid console appender config detected, console stream is = looping After this error, no further logging messages are displayed on the = JBoss console or appended to the JBoss log file. I have tried adjusting the log4j properties for both JPublish and = JBoss, but have not been able to correct this. Code is my next stop, but = I thought I'd first ask if anyone else can reproduce this behaviour or = offer some hints? Thanks in advance Ben |