|
From: John M. <jm...@ma...> - 2001-08-29 18:08:14
|
Hi; John Leuner wrote: > > > I hate to single you out Gilbert but I think you're the only person > > arguing for making this a research project. Everyone else that has > > chimed in has said they want to build a specific implementation of jos > > and call it JOS. I am sensing a consensus that people are willing to > > compromise on a single vision (even if its not exactly what they want) > > as long as it moves the project forward to creating a jos. I believe > > there is an understanding that _any_ initial version of jos is better > > than nothing and that there will be future opportunities for adjusting > > the vision or forking off other versions of jos once we get _something_ > > off the ground. > > I agree with you. Me three. > > Does anyone else agree with Gilbert? If so, please speak up. I'd > > really like to keep things moving while we have some minimal momentum. > > As such, if there is no more debate I'd like to push forward and take a > > vote so we can move on (more debate beyond the established position of > > Gilbert and myself which seem pretty firm (and so further debate seems > > pointless)). > > What vote would you like to take? I also confess to a little confusion here about exactly what we'd be voting on. I'm further confused as to whether I actually qualify to cast a vote or not, so maybe it's a moot point for me. -jm -- ==== John Morrison ==== MAK Technologies Inc. ==== 185 Alewife Brook Parkway, Cambridge, MA 02138 ==== http://www.mak.com/ ==== vox:617-876-8085 x115 ==== fax:617-876-9208 ==== jm...@ma... |