Re: [jOrgan-user] fluidsynth reverb

[<joh...@ex...>]

Hi Sven,

Thank you for drawing this promising development in Fluidsynth to our attention.

As JohnB said, the samples provided do not exactly suit what we are listening for,  but at least two of the reverb engines (apart from the cyclic modulation one) do offer good sound, as far as I could tell. So this could be the answer for jOrgan folk like JohnB, who have a real problem with that modulation in the current FS version 2.

I have downloaded the pre-compiled binary for Windows 10, in the hope that I may be able to test it out, using Jack for Windows. At the moment I will need help from a friend to sort it all out, and have approached him about it.

Best wishes,

JohnR

> 
> On Sun Mar 15 2026 Sven Meier via jOrgan-user
> <jor...@li...> wrote:
> 
> ---------- Original Message ----------
> 
> Hi everyone,
> 
> since FluidSynth’s reverb has been a recurring topic on the
> jOrgan list, 
> I thought it might be useful to share that the FluidSynth
> developers 
> have recently been working on improvements in this area.
> Please see the 
> quoted message from the FluidSynth mailing list below for
> details.
> 
> It might be a good opportunity for us to offer some feedback or 
> suggestions regarding this new feature.
> 
> https://www.fluidsynth.org/api/ReverbOverview.html
> 
> Regards
> Sven
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> it took almost four
> years, but now there is an implementation ready for 
> supporting different
> reverb engines. Pls. check out this GitHub 
> discussion and feel free to
> share your thoughts:
> 
> https://github.com/FluidSynth/fluidsynth/discussions/1771
> 
> Tom
> 
> fluid-dev
> mailing list
> flu...@no...
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-dev
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> jOrgan-user mailing list
> jOr...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jorgan-user
> 
>