You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(6) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
|
2003 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(6) |
May
(14) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2004 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(89) |
May
(109) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(11) |
2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
|
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
(26) |
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(37) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(16) |
2007 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(67) |
Jun
(93) |
Jul
(116) |
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(6) |
2008 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(27) |
2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(23) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(15) |
2010 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(10) |
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(3) |
2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(15) |
2015 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(15) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(24) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(58) |
2016 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(2) |
2017 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2019 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
2021 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2022 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
2024 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-11-02 14:35:01
|
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > > I use joe as my $EDITOR. Very often recently, when writing emails in > > > mutt (like this one), when I exit joe using "^K X", joe seems to hang. > > > I get no response from the console, and am still seeing the joe > > > "window". Yet "ps" says joe is still "running" ("R"): > > > > > > eedmoba 8976 0.1 0.2 1000 824 pts/0 S 16:27:29 0:00 grep joe > > > eedmoba 8915 36.9 0.3 1688 1448 pts/1 R 16:21:52 0:10 joe -nobackups /tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0 > > > eedmoba 8914 0.0 0.2 944 776 pts/1 S 16:21:52 0:00 sh -c joe -nobackups '/tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0' > > > > > > If I kill joe with "-3" (the nicest possible way), I return to mutt > > > properly, and my file was also saved properly by joe... OTOH, the > > > "^K X" seems to have stuck, it lands inside mutt. > > > > > > I've been having this very often in joe-2.9.7-pre3, possibly in -pre2 > > > as well, but definitely never before. I could check. > > > > Confirmed. It happens to me as well. I can add that it happens with ^K D > > also. Tested on -pre3. > > What platform (arch) does it happen on? i686-slackware-gnu-linux. One correction - it did happen in pre2. And I dunno how to reproduce it. It just sometimes (rarely) happens. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-02 14:27:11
|
> > I use joe as my $EDITOR. Very often recently, when writing emails in > > mutt (like this one), when I exit joe using "^K X", joe seems to hang. > > I get no response from the console, and am still seeing the joe > > "window". Yet "ps" says joe is still "running" ("R"): > > > > eedmoba 8976 0.1 0.2 1000 824 pts/0 S 16:27:29 0:00 grep joe > > eedmoba 8915 36.9 0.3 1688 1448 pts/1 R 16:21:52 0:10 joe -nobackups /tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0 > > eedmoba 8914 0.0 0.2 944 776 pts/1 S 16:21:52 0:00 sh -c joe -nobackups '/tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0' > > > > If I kill joe with "-3" (the nicest possible way), I return to mutt > > properly, and my file was also saved properly by joe... OTOH, the > > "^K X" seems to have stuck, it lands inside mutt. > > > > I've been having this very often in joe-2.9.7-pre3, possibly in -pre2 > > as well, but definitely never before. I could check. > > Confirmed. It happens to me as well. I can add that it happens with ^K D > also. Tested on -pre3. What platform (arch) does it happen on? Cheers, Vita |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-11-02 14:13:47
|
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:39:41PM +0100, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > Hi, > > I use joe as my $EDITOR. Very often recently, when writing emails in > mutt (like this one), when I exit joe using "^K X", joe seems to hang. > I get no response from the console, and am still seeing the joe > "window". Yet "ps" says joe is still "running" ("R"): > > eedmoba 8976 0.1 0.2 1000 824 pts/0 S 16:27:29 0:00 grep joe > eedmoba 8915 36.9 0.3 1688 1448 pts/1 R 16:21:52 0:10 joe -nobackups /tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0 > eedmoba 8914 0.0 0.2 944 776 pts/1 S 16:21:52 0:00 sh -c joe -nobackups '/tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0' > > If I kill joe with "-3" (the nicest possible way), I return to mutt > properly, and my file was also saved properly by joe... OTOH, the > "^K X" seems to have stuck, it lands inside mutt. Trying to reproduce it, but all works for me(tm). I tried the latest joe (writing in it right now) in mutt. What's your arch? Does it happen also in command line or in mutt only? Can you strace (truss) it (test, where joe spins)? Please, can you find the first bad release? Cheers, Vita |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-10-31 15:46:02
|
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Moritz Barsnick wrote: > I use joe as my $EDITOR. Very often recently, when writing emails in > mutt (like this one), when I exit joe using "^K X", joe seems to hang. > I get no response from the console, and am still seeing the joe > "window". Yet "ps" says joe is still "running" ("R"): > > eedmoba 8976 0.1 0.2 1000 824 pts/0 S 16:27:29 0:00 grep joe > eedmoba 8915 36.9 0.3 1688 1448 pts/1 R 16:21:52 0:10 joe -nobackups /tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0 > eedmoba 8914 0.0 0.2 944 776 pts/1 S 16:21:52 0:00 sh -c joe -nobackups '/tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0' > > If I kill joe with "-3" (the nicest possible way), I return to mutt > properly, and my file was also saved properly by joe... OTOH, the > "^K X" seems to have stuck, it lands inside mutt. > > I've been having this very often in joe-2.9.7-pre3, possibly in -pre2 > as well, but definitely never before. I could check. Confirmed. It happens to me as well. I can add that it happens with ^K D also. Tested on -pre3. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Moritz B. <bar...@gm...> - 2001-10-31 15:40:44
|
Hi, I use joe as my $EDITOR. Very often recently, when writing emails in mutt (like this one), when I exit joe using "^K X", joe seems to hang. I get no response from the console, and am still seeing the joe "window". Yet "ps" says joe is still "running" ("R"): eedmoba 8976 0.1 0.2 1000 824 pts/0 S 16:27:29 0:00 grep joe eedmoba 8915 36.9 0.3 1688 1448 pts/1 R 16:21:52 0:10 joe -nobackups /tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0 eedmoba 8914 0.0 0.2 944 776 pts/1 S 16:21:52 0:00 sh -c joe -nobackups '/tmp/mutt-sun98-8913-0' If I kill joe with "-3" (the nicest possible way), I return to mutt properly, and my file was also saved properly by joe... OTOH, the "^K X" seems to have stuck, it lands inside mutt. I've been having this very often in joe-2.9.7-pre3, possibly in -pre2 as well, but definitely never before. I could check. What's happening? Moritz |
From: Xavier N. <nic...@ef...> - 2001-10-31 11:34:14
|
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:34:16AM +0000, Mikhael Goikhman wrote: > Another programming practice in this case is to replace all allocation > functions (malloc -> safemalloc), so they always pass, like here: > ftp://ftp.fvwm.org/pub/fvwm/devel/sources/libs/safemalloc.c There is also dmalloc: http://dmalloc.com/ It must work well with autoconf/automake (I have not used it yet, but it looks good). -- Nicollet Xavier I2 Info EFREI Linux: http://www.linux.efrei.fr/ Le piratage tue le libre |
From: Mikhael G. <mi...@ho...> - 2001-10-31 10:34:22
|
On 30 Oct 2001 15:56:34 +0100, Pawel Kot wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > > - test for return values form syscalls and library calls (malloc(), > > etc.) > > malloc on at least linux _never_ fails. If there's not enough > memory it just delays the allocation till it is needed. > But agreed that retvals should be checked in good programming style. Another programming practice in this case is to replace all allocation functions (malloc -> safemalloc), so they always pass, like here: ftp://ftp.fvwm.org/pub/fvwm/devel/sources/libs/safemalloc.c Usually if there is no memory, the program can't function and should exit. Regards, Mikhael. |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-10-30 14:56:59
|
On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > - test for return values form syscalls and library calls (malloc(), > etc.) malloc on at least linux _never_ fails. If there's not enough memory it just delays the allocation till it is needed. But agreed that retvals should be checked in good programming style. pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Marek G. <xg...@in...> - 2001-10-30 14:51:52
|
Hi, I have added them to task maanger on SF. marx > > [under code cleanup] > - test for return values form syscalls and library calls (malloc(), > etc.) > - use assert() where applicable - there are dereferencies of > pointers, but are the pointers valid? (probably yes) > - more user friendly messages in error conditions > > _______________________________________________ > Joe-editor-general mailing list > Joe...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/joe-editor-general > |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-10-30 14:39:10
|
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:53:55PM +0100, Marek Grac wrote: > Hi, > > last days ago, there was a problem that two people were doing > same. because i want to minimalize the chance of duplicate work, i think Are you talking about me? What have I done? Vita |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-10-30 07:05:12
|
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 06:48:21PM +0100, Marek Grac wrote: > Hi, > > task manager on SF is now running so pls. select what you would > like to do. > > I'm not quite sure if support for POSIX (or/and) perl regexps > should be in 2.9.8 or in 2.9.9. it will depend on difficulty of other > tasks. i believe that 2.9.8 will be published in early December. If you > have other opinion pls mail it to list. It would be great, if would do this at all; didn't looked at the code, but think it's pretty hard. If we do this, then before joe-3.x. (Sorry, I'm in rather pesimistic mood today) Cheers, Vita |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-10-30 07:01:12
|
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:53:55PM +0100, Marek Grac wrote: > Hi, > > last days ago, there was a problem that two people were doing > same. because i want to minimalize the chance of duplicate work, i think > is right time to use task manager (not on page, because i can't turn it on > but this is going to be solved soon). i would be glad if you will use this > capability. so until task manager will be ok, there are list of task for > 2.9.8 (if you are going to do something what is not in tasklist plz mail > it here): > - gettext support > - support for help files in national languages > - clean source > - documentation of macro system (perhaps rewrite it) > - get rid of config.h > - addign -Dpath > - solve bug #449489 "^KD always ask for filename" > - solve bug #453925 "some default keybindings" if they are not > defined > - finish documenation of help system [marx] [under code cleanup] - test for return values form syscalls and library calls (malloc(), etc.) - use assert() where applicable - there are dereferencies of pointers, but are the pointers valid? (probably yes) - more user friendly messages in error conditions |
From: Vitezslav S. <sa...@ma...> - 2001-10-30 06:57:17
|
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:53:55PM +0100, Marek Grac wrote: > Hi, > > last days ago, there was a problem that two people were doing > same. because i want to minimalize the chance of duplicate work, i think > is right time to use task manager (not on page, because i can't turn it on > but this is going to be solved soon). i would be glad if you will use this > capability. so until task manager will be ok, there are list of task for > 2.9.8 (if you are going to do something what is not in tasklist plz mail > it here): > - gettext support As I think uf it more and more, I consider it not doable (in a simple way). There are only small number of interactive texts to be written in different languages (that's OK - less work for us :-)); there are also interactive menus: would you be changing the keybindings, when there is no the same character as in original (english) text? What about various lengths of messages (think of fixed size buffers etc.)? Perhaps all above is solvable. On the international help files: done with gettext or simply with various files in @sysconfdir@? If as files, we should consider automatic selection of the help file using setlocale(). Cheers, Vita |
From: Marek G. <xg...@in...> - 2001-10-29 17:48:28
|
Hi, task manager on SF is now running so pls. select what you would like to do. I'm not quite sure if support for POSIX (or/and) perl regexps should be in 2.9.8 or in 2.9.9. it will depend on difficulty of other tasks. i believe that 2.9.8 will be published in early December. If you have other opinion pls mail it to list. marx |
From: Marek G. <xg...@in...> - 2001-10-29 16:54:05
|
Hi, last days ago, there was a problem that two people were doing same. because i want to minimalize the chance of duplicate work, i think is right time to use task manager (not on page, because i can't turn it on but this is going to be solved soon). i would be glad if you will use this capability. so until task manager will be ok, there are list of task for 2.9.8 (if you are going to do something what is not in tasklist plz mail it here): - gettext support - support for help files in national languages - clean source - documentation of macro system (perhaps rewrite it) - get rid of config.h - addign -Dpath - solve bug #449489 "^KD always ask for filename" - solve bug #453925 "some default keybindings" if they are not defined - finish documenation of help system [marx] marx |
From: Koblinger E. <eg...@su...> - 2001-10-29 16:33:46
|
> $ echo usearch.c | xargs joe Neither works on Linux. Must be a bug (feature?) of xargs, independently from joe. You should leave the stdin of joe free from any utilities, connected right to your terminal. egmont |
From: Moritz B. <bar...@gm...> - 2001-10-29 16:26:13
|
Hi there, this has been a problem for quite a few versions of joe, but I just rembered now, sorry. Perhaps something to fix for 2.9.9. When I call joe with a few filenames using "xargs", joe opens a host of frames and then ... exits. Too many frames perhaps? I do something like this: $ find . -type f -name \*.c | xargs joe A file "DEADJOE" is created with the contents: *** Modified files in JOE when it aborted on Mon Oct 29 17:07:31 2001 *** JOE was aborted because the terminal closed I'm attaching the output of "truss" (as joe.truss), which is somewhat an equivilant of "strace" on Solaris. I can't actually see any reason between opening the last file, printing the status line, and then writing "DEADJOE". Hmm. Now, the funny thing is: If I call joe directly with the same set of arguments, everything's fine! $ joe `find -type f -name \*.c` (Except for one thing: I hold Ctrl-C pressed, and the last file then mucks up the display. Oh well, minor stuff.) Well, it seems joe doesn't like xargs at all: $ echo usearch.c | xargs joe Same phenomenon! Actually, xargs should call joe with the same stdin and stdout, without a pipe. It's just a tool for calling joe with arguments. What's up? (There's a truss output for this attached as well, because it's shorter, joe.truss.02 .) Anybody for investigations? Shall I post the bug to sourceforge.net? Thanks, Moritz |
From: Mikhael G. <mi...@ho...> - 2001-10-25 23:19:35
|
On 24 Oct 2001 07:56:22 +0200, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > Two problems: I want to get rid of config.h and use autoconf.h only. > > Adding -Dpath into autoconf.h: I wanted to do that but I don't know how. I > want to make it customizable by configure switch --sysconfdir but autoconf > doesn't replace @sysconfdir@ in the autoconf.h. Do you know any solution? Solution 1: Add this line to configure.in: AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(MYDIR, "$sysconfdir") and this line to autoconf.h.in: #undef MYDIR ----------------------------------------- Solution 2: Add this to configure.in (not really needed, just to show the idea): FOODIR='${datadir}'/joe AC_SUBST(FOODIR) and this to Makefile.am: AM_CFLAGS = -DMYDIR=\"$(sysconfdir)\" -DFOODIR=\"$(FOODIR)\" Regards, Mikhael. |
From: Marek G. <xg...@in...> - 2001-10-25 14:46:32
|
Hi, new list of features for 2.9.8 > Features which should be in 2.9.8 > - (main) gettext support > - (main) support for help files for different languages > - cleaner source > - documentation (and perhaps rewriting) of macro system > - removing bugs ;) > - (rel2) get rid of config.h > - (rel2) adding -Dpath in autoconf - (new) set some default keybidings into executable (sf.net BUG #453925) - (new) solve sf.net BUG #449489 (^KD always asks for filename) marx |
From: Moritz B. <bar...@gm...> - 2001-10-25 14:35:00
|
Hi again, one more remark (except: "why does my email get the '[Joe]' subject line and not '[Joe-Editor-General]'?"): joe.1.in is being parsed by configure to produce joe.1. Yet configure does _not_ replace everything fully expanded, you need to un-expand everything and then 'sed' it. My joe.1 on Solaris (my Linux RPM build uses --exec-prefix and such fully expanded) has a man page containing stuff like "usually resides as \fB${exec_prefix}/bin/joe\fR" and the likes. Just wondering, Moritz |
From: Moritz B. <bar...@gm...> - 2001-10-25 14:12:06
|
Hi everyone, as requested, I've reviewed the current joe version 2.9.7-pre2, especially against my earlier remarks, bug reports and patches (e.g. on sourceforge.net). Nice going this time! Special thanks to Vita, because thanks to his wordwrap fix, my joe now finally wraps correctly again on both Solaris and Linux. :-) System 1: Linux-2.4.x, RedHat-7.x System 2: Solaris 2.6 (SunOS5.6) I may try SunOS4.1.4 later. ;-) (I really like the spec file in the src.rpm on SourceForge (probably because of the nice handling of Mandrake specialties), except for that "pre2" was in the "Release" variable, and not in the Version. "Release" should have been something like "1" or "1sf" or "1joe".) You wanted comments, so here they come. All very minor. 1.) In the "install-extra-hooks" section of Makefile.am, you're linking the various incarnations of joe (jmacs et.al.) to joe. These should be relative links and not absolute links. In the src.rpm from SourceForge, a patch (Makefile.patch) was already provided. 2.) I liked the way the man pages also used to be linked. IIRC, this doesn't work with all versions of "man", but it works with mine. :) In mean: "for i in jmacs.1 jstar.1 ...; do ln -s joe.1 $i; done". I added this to my own spec file on my Linux RedHat system, because when I tried it in the install-extra-hooks, it seems the man pages weren't installed yet. (Perhaps there's something like "install-man-extra-hooks"? I'm no automake expert.) SPEC entry (rpm-4.0.x): %makeinstall (cd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/man1 && \ for i in jmacs.1 jstar.1 rjoe.1 jpico.1 ; do ln -s joe.1 "$i" ; done) 3.) Under Linux, automake puts a very ridiculous "transform" directive into the Makefile{,.in} which installs my binary as "linux-gnu-redhat-i386-joe". :-P This doesn't work in the RedHat RPM build, obviously. I've attached %{name}-2.9.7-pre2-Makefile_transform.patch to fix it, but I believe it may be an automake problem (?). 4.) The directive -DJOERC="\"/path/to/etc/\"" has a superfluous "/" at the end, as in the source code, @JOERC@ is always used with an appended "/" anyway. 5.) I didn't set "-Wall" on Linux, but on Solaris, I still get quite a few warnings. I'd look into them, but as this is being discussed on the list, I'll just wait for the next patch. :-) I'm also attaching my spec file. I'll align my changes and preferences with the spec file from SourceForge (hey, who's the author? :->) soon. Also, I might try a build on SunOS4.1.4, if I manage to log in. ;-) Greetings, good work, Moritz |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-10-25 12:38:25
|
On Thu, 25 Oct 2001, Marek Grac wrote: > problem with reply-to can't be solved on SF, because they are > against it, look at > > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc?docid=6693&group_id=1 Page not found... pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |
From: Marek G. <xg...@in...> - 2001-10-25 12:10:46
|
Hi, problem with reply-to can't be solved on SF, because they are against it, look at http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc?docid=6693&group_id=1 marx |
From: Alexandre P. N. <alex@PolesApart.dhs.org> - 2001-10-25 02:02:12
|
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Pawel Kot wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Vitezslav Samel wrote: > > > Two problems: I want to get rid of config.h and use autoconf.h only. > > Why? > The config.h comes from pre-autoconf version, adopting autoconf is (always) work in progress. Leaving user-editable headers implies interactive setup in some sort, while with autoconf's keyword it's only a matter of ./configure --something, which can be done automated (read "non-interactively") by, i.e., bsd ports or something like that. > > Adding -Dpath into autoconf.h: I wanted to do that but I don't know how. I > > want to make it customizable by configure switch --sysconfdir but autoconf > > doesn't replace @sysconfdir@ in the autoconf.h. Do you know any solution? > > Sorry. Dunno. But it would be easy to do it in config.in ;-) > I tried and gave up, that's why it's the way it is right now, but good lucky, when you find the right way, share with me so that I stop abusing -Dsomething everywhere :-) Regards, Alexandre |
From: Pawel K. <pk...@li...> - 2001-10-24 21:09:52
|
On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Xavier Nicollet wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:52:33PM +0200, Pawel Kot wrote: > > PS. Can anybody configure the list, so its address appeard in Reply-to? > > If you use mutt just type 'g' instead of 'r' for replying. No. See my headers ;-) pkot -- mailto:pk...@li... :: mailto:pk...@sl... http://kt.linuxnews.pl/ :: Kernel Traffic po polsku http://tfuj.pl/cv.html :: http://tfuj.pl/pgp.asc |