Re: [Joda-interest] ReadableDateTime contract

[Brian S O'N. <bro...@ea...>]

I fixed toISODateTime and renamed it to toTrustedISODateTime, adding 
some more comments.

Should the toMutableDateTime methods simply be removed outright? They 
don't offer anything useful anymore.

Stephen Colebourne wrote:

>Backdoor removed and javadoc added.
>
>I also added modifcation via copy methods to DateTimeProperty.
>
>Stephen
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "ONeill, Brian" <Bri...@di...>
>Yes, this is a backdoor that shouldn't be there. A class cast is also a
>backdoor, but less likely to be accidental. The toMutableDateTime method
>should not be part of the interface, but the method is still useful when
>defined in DateTime only.
>
>
>  
>
>  
>