From: Herbert J. B. <ya...@be...> - 2004-02-18 23:29:33
|
The distinction between oldunix and oldwindows is simply a recognition of the fact that they don't work precisely the same way. A dotted notation is OK by me. Any other people have opinions? This code will be written in the next couple of weeks. ===================================================== Herbert J. Bernstein, Professor of Computer Science Dowling College, Kramer Science Center, KSC 121 Idle Hour Blvd, Oakdale, NY, 11769 +1-631-244-3035 ya...@do... ===================================================== On Wed, 18 Feb 2004, Miguel Howard wrote: > Herbert said: > > >> As we build up a new set of defaults we could then add > >> one more command > >> > >> set default <setup> > >> > >> where setup would be the name of a "standard" set of default > >> settings all packaged together (e.g. oldunix, oldwindows, > >> newcommon, etc.) This way we would not break any existing > >> scripts, but could move towards common choices that satisfy > >> current demands. > > I think that this sounds like a *very* good idea. > > One thing ... it isn't clear to me why we would want to make the platform > distinction (you said 'oldunix, oldwindows'). > > If there is a need to make some type of platform distinction, then we may > want to consider a hyphenated or dotted name so that it could be optional: > old > old.unix > old.windows > > Miguel > > > > [*** Normal Termination ***] > |