From: E.L. W. <eg...@sc...> - 2003-04-08 08:20:50
|
On Tuesday 08 April 2003 10:08, Miguel wrote: > > Working on v5 is more stable though... > > Actually, I'm not sure I agree with this :) > There are a few bugs in v6 having to do with atom properties, but I think > the code is quite stable. What I meant more than the runtime stableness of the code, is the stableness of the source code itself... that is likely to see changes. But as long is the performance analysis is a automized/general as possible, that should be no problem either... Egon |