Re: Move to CDK (was: [Jmol-developers] fine rotation)

[Egon W. <eg...@sc...>]

On Thursday 28 November 2002 10:00, Fabian Dortu wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-11-27 at 18:50, Miguel Howard wrote:
> > I think that some of the code that is in the old Atom.java should be
> > moved out of there.
> > For example, all the references to transform and screenPosition (and
> > screenX/Y/Z/Diameter) should be part of AtomShape, not part of the basic
> > Atom representation.
>
> I agree. I my UnitBox class, I did not use the Atom class because it was
> consuming to much memory unnecessary.

Except for that mentioned by Miguel, can you elaborate on other issues you 
have with Atom? I would like very much to have the UnitBox use the Atom 
class...

Egon