|
From: Jonathan G. <gu...@uw...> - 2021-03-07 23:31:44
|
I see no problem with dropping the signing of the application, unless some versions of the JavaVM will not run unsigned jars. Jonathan Dr. Jonathan Gutow Chemistry Department UW Oshkosh web: https://uwosh.edu/facstaff/gutow e-mail: gu...@uw... Ph: 920-424-1326 ________________________________ From: Robert Hanson via Jmol-developers <jmo...@li...> Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 3:16 PM To: Jmol Developers <jmo...@li...> Cc: Robert Hanson <ha...@st...> Subject: [Jmol-developers] signing jar files CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I have not been signing the Jmol.jar file for some time now. No one has complained. How do others feel about my continuing to do that? I know it was important for the applet, but we are not distributing the Java applet anymore. So can we be done with signing? This has been an expense of about $250 for me each year for the past many years. Bob -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College Northfield, MN http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 We stand on the homelands of the Wahpekute Band of the Dakota Nation. We honor with gratitude the people who have stewarded the land throughout the generations and their ongoing contributions to this region. We acknowledge the ongoing injustices that we have committed against the Dakota Nation, and we wish to interrupt this legacy, beginning with acts of healing and honest storytelling about this place. |