[Jmol-users] R: Re: Parsing JME string

[<pin...@li...>]

Angel i tried your page with a molecule with 3 carbons chain and two phenil 
attached ... in mol is very fast. In JME esport is much slower
Pino

>----Messaggio originale----
>Da: ang...@ua...
>Data: 29/10/2013 10.35
>A: <jmo...@li...>
>Ogg: Re: [Jmol-users] Parsing JME string
>
>Hello Wenhan Chen
>
>Maybe this helps you:
>http://biomodel.uah.es/en/DIY/JSME/
>
>That's using JSME, the non-Java alternative to JME
>
>JME to Jmol (both Java applets):
>http://biomodel.uah.es/en/DIY/JME/JME.htm
>
>When you say it is slow, what size of molecule are you speaking 
>about?
>
>If you pass the molecule as SMILES, I think it needs a server as 
>intermediate. But you can pass the molecule as MOL or as JME format, 
>then you don't need any servers and J(S)mol will do the 3D 
>calculation.
>
>Why do you expect that the server will be quicker? Do you mean 
>running it in Java in trhe server?
>Regarding the GPL, I'm no expert but Jmol exists as a library to be 
>included in other software and also as JmolData.jar which does 
>calculations without the rendering as may be suitable to be run in 
>the server.
>
>
>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Android is increasing in popularity, but the open development platform that
>developers love is also attractive to malware creators. Download this white
>paper to learn more about secure code signing practices that can help keep
>Android apps secure.
>http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=65839951&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>_______________________________________________
>Jmol-users mailing list
>Jmo...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>