From: Robert H. <ha...@st...> - 2013-10-18 13:07:47
|
Hmm, this is working as well: x = Jmol.evaluate(jmolApplet0, "'CCCC'.find('SMARTS','[#6]')") both in 13.2 and 13.3. Could it just be a version issue? Please try 13.2.7 or 13.3.7 Bob On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 8:00 AM, Robert Hanson <ha...@st...> wrote: > Sorry for the delay in getting back to you, Mike. I've been totally > focused on converting JSpecView to JavaScript. Much success, but not > trivial by any means!! > > > > However, searching a string for a SMARTS string does not work, e.g. > X = Jmol.evaluate(myJSmol, '"CCCC".find("SMARTS","[#6]")' > > ); // X is ERROR > > > This works fine in the app: > > > $ print "CCCC".find("SMARTS","[#6]") > 1 > 5 > 8 > 11 > > > and this in the JavaScript version of the console: > > > print "CCCC".find("SMARTS","[#6]") > > > 1 > 5 > 8 > 11 > > > So there must be a problem with Jmol.evaluate() itself. Stand by.... > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 6:19 AM, Mike Casey <mik...@uc...> wrote: > >> Hi All,**** >> >> ** ** >> >> In the context of developing a tutorial site I need to compare user >> generated (JSME) SMILES strings with the “correct” SMARTS strings without >> loading the structure into JSmol (the intention is that the user can >> subsequently opt to use JSmol to view the structure if they wish). The >> powerful SMILES and SMARTS features of JSmol seemed ideal for this purpose, >> but I have run into some difficulties, as listed below. **** >> >> ** ** >> >> Searching an atom expression (when a structure is present in JSmol) for a >> SMARTS string works, e.g.**** >> >> X = Jmol.evaluate(myJSmol, '{*}.find("SMARTS","[#6]")'); //Works as >> expected**** >> >> ** ** >> >> However, searching a string for a SMARTS string does not work, e.g.**** >> >> X = Jmol.evaluate(myJSmol, '"CCCC".find("SMARTS","[#6]")'); // X is >> ERROR**** >> >> ** ** >> >> On the other hand, calculating a molecular formula from a SMARTS string >> (or an atom expression) does work, e.g.**** >> >> X = Jmol.evaluate(myJSmol, '"CCCC".find("SMARTS","MF")'); //X is C 4 >> Correct!!!**** >> >> ** ** >> >> I would be very grateful if anyone can identify what I am doing wrong, or >> suggest an alternative approach.**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Mike**** >> >> ** ** >> >> Dr Mike Casey >> School of Chemistry & Chemical Biology >> University College Dublin >> Dublin 4 >> Ireland **** >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> October Webinars: Code for Performance >> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. >> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most >> from >> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > >> >> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60134071&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk >> _______________________________________________ >> Jmol-users mailing list >> Jmo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users >> >> > > > -- > Robert M. Hanson > Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry > St. Olaf College > Northfield, MN > http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr > > > If nature does not answer first what we want, > it is better to take what answer we get. > > -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 > > -- Robert M. Hanson Larson-Anderson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College Northfield, MN http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 |