Re: [Jmol-users] trouble with isosurface with Jmol-13.0.RC1

[Shore, J. <Jay.Shore@SDSTATE.EDU>]

Angel,

Thank you very much for your suggestions.  I did you first suggestion and
the .jmol file loaded fine, except the isosurfaces were not translated
like when I made the .jmol file.  In making the .jmol file I had used
translateSelected which worked.

I also tried your second suggestion, which gave me a similar result, the
isosurfaces were not translated, but also neither isosurface was connected
to a model.

Thank you again for your help.
Jay




On 7/21/12 1:26 PM, "Angel Herráez" <ang...@ua...> wrote:

>Hello Jay
>
>Two ideas:
>
>1. you should not use FILE after APPEND. There must be a single word
>after 
>load. "Load files" is only needed when multiple files are loaded in one
>command.
>That is,
>load "file1.cml";
>load append "file2.cml";
>
>2. I don't think that "select 2.1" is meaninful regarding the isosurface.
>You 
>can attach isosurfaces to frames/models declaring explicitly that
>association:
>
>load files "file1.cml" "file2.cml";
>isosurface id 0 model 1.1 etc.;
>isosurface id 1 model 2.1 etc.;
>
>or something ike that; see "isosurface" options in the online scripting
>doc.
>
>It could  also --maybe-- be achieved using "frame 2.1" where you use
>"select 
>2.1"
>(Doc says "the surface generated is associated with the currently
>displayed 
>model by default")
> 
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------------
>----
>Live Security Virtual Conference
>Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
>threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
>will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
>threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
>_______________________________________________
>Jmol-users mailing list
>Jmo...@li...
>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users