Re: [Jmol-users] new PNG format options

[Robert H. <ha...@st...>]

Thanks for pointing that out, Rolf. I'll see if I can get that more clearly
in the documentation.
Maybe some slightly different PNG compression values there. I don't know,
but I wouldn't worry about it.

Bob


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:34 AM, Rolf Huehne <rh...@fl...> wrote:

>
> But I noticed a strange size difference between a Jmol version that
> doesn't save the state within the image and Jmol 12.2.2 (example '1vri',
> PNG, compression 9):
>
> Jmol 11.6.8: 126323 Bytes
> Jmol 12.2.2: 143424 Bytes - imageState off
> Jmol 12.2.2: 293111 Bytes - imageState on
>
> The images look identical (after all labels are switched off).
>
> Regards,
> Rolf
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
> contains a definitive record of customers, application performance,
> security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this
> data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>



-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
1520 St. Olaf Ave.
Northfield, MN 55057
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
phone: 507-786-3107


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get.

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900