From: Robert H. <ha...@st...> - 2011-09-19 18:12:47
|
Terrific. Somehow I never found that myself. We should test a few other aspects as well. I should note that Jmol will have a different definition of "aromatic" -- not one based on bonding. Essentially our definition is "aromatic or antiaromatic" -- ring, all sp2, that's all. That's possible because we are starting with actual 3D structures generally, not just SMILES strings. Bob -- Robert M. Hanson Professor of Chemistry St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave. Northfield, MN 55057 http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr phone: 507-786-3107 If nature does not answer first what we want, it is better to take what answer we get. -- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900 |