From: Eric M. <em...@mi...> - 2009-09-22 18:23:05
|
Dear Bob, At 9/20/09, Robert Hanson wrote: >That's fixed. They are no longer incompatible. I'll get a version out >on chemapps.stolaf.edu later today. Thanks for fixing the incompatibility! >Anything else on your mind, Eric? > >Bob Well, Bob, I'll be sure and let you know if anything else comes up ... and sooner or later I'm sure it will ... :-) Thanks for continuing to make Jmol the greatest!! -Eric >On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Eric Martz ><em...@mi...> wrote: > > Earlier, I reported that when animation and spin are on concurrently, > > bad things happen. > > > > Bob replied on 9/1/09: "This does not surprise me at all. Spin and > > animation are two separate threads, both of which force updates. I > > don't think they are compatible." > > > > I'd like to suggest that this incompatibility be handled more > > gracefully by Jmol. For example, maybe "animation on" should > > automatically turn off "spin"? A message "Spin and animation cannot > > run concurrently" could be issued. And ditto for a "spin on" command > > issued when animation is already on. > > > > Or an error message could be issued, and the command disregarded. > > > > Thanks, -Eric > > |