Re: [Jmol-developers] Jmol and UFF

[Bob H. <ha...@st...>]

Egon, I'm worried I detect sarcasm in that message. Just asking for 
clarification.

Bob


Egon Willighagen wrote:
> cc: cdk-devel
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison
> <ge...@ge...> wrote:
>   
>>  On Mar 23, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote:
>>  > Unless this would happen... though this would require everyone who
>>  > every contributed to the code to agree with this, including the
>>  > authors of the original babel code,
>>
>>  Tim and I have already explicitly stated our approval that LGPL is
>>  fine for the force field classes. I believe the jmol-developers list
>>  may have bounced that message since I'm not a member of the list.
>>     
>
> I haven't seen a bounce message...
>
>   
>>  There's no need to worry about the "authors of the original babel
>>  code." The force field classes are highly self-contained. Bob has
>>  essentially taken just the bits that Tim and I (and mostly Tim) added
>>  to Open Babel.
>>     
>
> Oh, really? I am really happy to hear that! I'm sure the CDK will have
> a close look at the code too then!
>
> Egon
>
>