Re: [Jmol-users] bondOrder - what about 2.5 ? or 5.1 or 3.2....

[Bob H. <ha...@st...>]

I misspoke:

The following are equivalent:

partial 1.1      partial
partial 2.2      partialDouble
partial 3.1      partialTriple
partial 3.4      partialTriple2

The following are equivalent IN APPEARANCE ONLY:

partial 1.0      single
partial 2.0      double
partial 3.0      triple
partial 4.0      quadruple
partial 2.1      aromatic

-- 
Robert M. Hanson
Professor of Chemistry
St. Olaf College
Northfield, MN
http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr


If nature does not answer first what we want,
it is better to take what answer we get. 

-- Josiah Willard Gibbs, Lecture XXX, Monday, February 5, 1900