Re: [Jmol-users] question about spinning

[<rg...@el...>]

On Mon, May 22, 2006 5:36 am, Angel Herraez said:
> I would say the spinning could retain its status, at least in respect to
> spin x , y , z.

I don't see why the spin should be an applet state as opposed to a
molecule state.

I can see setting some things as an applet (or rendering) state that you'd
want to have as defaults for any incoming molecule but I guess 'spin'
doesn't strike me that way.

Rich