Re: [Jmol-users] New test pages

[Bob H. <ha...@st...>]

OK, so that suggests a clear documentation note.
Interesting that in general, if you delete a bond, you can very easily 
replace it, because
that "void" will be all  that will be targeted by the next connect 
command similar to

connect 2.0 (*) (*)

(for example). This is because in general, that will be the only place 
where atoms are unbonded and that close together.

Bob


Nick Greeves wrote:

> Bob,
> These work as expected and make the new features very clear.
> My only comment is that I did not expect that connect DELETE AROMATIC 
> would leave nothing between those atoms. Co3porph shows this clearly.
> Of course it makes sense but Organic chemists expect to see bonds of 
> some sort! 
>
> All the best
>
> Nick
>
> -- 
>
> WWW Pages:     http://www.liv.ac.uk/Chemistrywww/Staff/greeves.html
>
> Tel:             +44 (0)151-794-3506 (3500 secretary)
>
>
>
> On 5 Apr 2006, at 04:33, jmo...@li... 
> <mailto:jmo...@li...> wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2006 21:46:59 -0500
>>
>> From: Bob Hanson <ha...@st... <mailto:ha...@st...>>
>>
>> To: jmo...@li... 
>> <mailto:jmo...@li...>, 
>> jmo...@li... 
>> <mailto:jmo...@li...>
>>
>> Subject: [Jmol-users] new test pages
>>
>> Reply-To: jmo...@li... 
>> <mailto:jmo...@li...>
>>
>>
>> To help us remember what new things there are in Jmol as we develop 
>> them, I thought I would start a new page. Ulimately these will be 
>> incorporated into the documentation, but for now, here are some sneak 
>> peeks into Jmol 10.1. What am I forgetting? As I remember new 
>> features or people suggest that I include them, I will. 
>>
>>
>> http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/test/10.1/new.htm
>>
>>
>