Re: [Jmol-users] Jmol specifications

[Frieda R. <fr...@ns...>]

Thanks Angel, I am glad to know it's not just me who is confused by=20
Java, and that given Sun's approach, it is not supposed to make=20
sense...
Frieda


On Sep 7, 2005, at 3:34 AM, Angel Herraez wrote:

> El 6 Sep 2005 a las 20:10, Frieda Reichsman escribi=F3:
>> Also, when I go to the Sun Java web site and click on downloads, I =
see
>> a download for JRE version 5 update 4, and nothing like "Sun Java
>> Plugin 1.4". Am I going to the wrong place at Sun? Or is the Java
>> Plugin just a part of what is installed by the Runtime Environment?
>
> In my opinion, Sun's Java terminology is far from coherent; I've
> always got confused; they call the same product in different ways.
> I'm not sure of the technical details, but from a practical point of
> view I have come to this conclusion.
> I think it can be accepted that the plugin is a part of the JRE.
> Regarding versions, it seems that from v.1.5 they started to call it
> v.5; so, "JRE version 5 update 4" is likely the same as the expected
> "JRE version 1.5.4".
> I bet you are in the right place, Frieda.
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle=20
> Practices
> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing=20=

> & QA
> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement *=20
> http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
> _______________________________________________
> Jmol-users mailing list
> Jmo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
>