|
From: Miguel <mi...@jm...> - 2005-07-17 16:11:26
|
> On a small aside: you seem to consider a molecular orbital with a > negative cutoff as a different orbital than one with a positive cutoff.= Yes, I understand > Chemists don't see it that way since what really has physical > significance is the square of the orbitals, so the negative isosurface > and the positive isosurface are considered at the same time. The reason= > to use signs is that the molecular orbital value can be negative, so > the mathematical construct does have that feature. The main reason, I > think, is that it is easier to see where nodal planes are, i.e, places > where the MO value goes through zero, which also makes it easier to see= > what the symmetry of the orbital is. The problem is ... I think that you want to be able to color the positive= and negative orbitals differently. I thought that this was the best scheme to be able to give control over color and display attributes of each independently. >> Q: Are you saying that a particular surface should be tied to a >> specific >> 'model' ? > > Yes indeed. This would solve your 'animation' problem too ... I'll think about this. Miguel |