Re: [Jmol-developers] Initial .cube file isosurface support

[Miguel <mi...@jm...>]

> The reason one may want to consider deleting a surface may be if it
> turns out that having, lets say 10 molecular orbitals with 2 polarities=

> for each orbital (i.e., 20 isosurfaces) on one atomset, which one would=

> like to be able to turn on/off base on a javascript....

I don't understand. 20 orbitals =3D=3D 20 surface -> 20 different names o=
n/off

> By the way, the isosurfaces only work on a single atomset (or frame).
> Would it be possible, down the line, to be able to set up multiple
> frames with isosurfaces and be able to animate them to see molecular
> orbitals been broken or made during a reaction?

I suppose that it would be possible at some point ...

> At the moment the isosurfaces are present for all atomsets, but I think=

> it may make more sense to have one associated with a single atomset
> (since I would assume that in most cases a different atomset would have=

> atoms in different locations and as such the isosurface of another one
> doesn't make sense).

Q: Are you saying that a particular surface should be tied to a specific
'model' ?



Miguel