Re: [Jmol-developers] Initial .cube file isosurface support

[<rka...@ri...>]

Hi Miguel,

I have been following the development of the isosurfaces with great=20
interest, and it is very exciting to have the cube support!

The reason one may want to consider deleting a surface may be if it=20
turns out that having, lets say 10 molecular orbitals with 2 polarities=20=

for each orbital (i.e., 20 isosurfaces) on one atomset, which one would=20=

like to be able to turn on/off base on a javascript....

By the way, the isosurfaces only work on a single atomset (or frame).=20
Would it be possible, down the line, to be able to set up multiple=20
frames with isosurfaces and be able to animate them to see molecular=20
orbitals been broken or made during a reaction?

At the moment the isosurfaces are present for all atomsets, but I think=20=

it may make more sense to have one associated with a single atomset=20
(since I would assume that in most cases a different atomset would have=20=

atoms in different locations and as such the isosurface of another one=20=

doesn't make sense).

Ren=E9

On Jul 17, 2005, at 7:01 AM, Miguel wrote:

>
> Q: Is there any reason why someone would want to delete a surface=20
> instead
> of turning it off?
>