Re: [Jmol-developers] Question on XSL

[Nicolas V. <nve...@cl...>]

From: "Daniel Leidert" <dan...@gm...>
> > > Further, the currently produced HTML code is not valid (I've tested
some
> > > time ago, when I was thinking about a better way of translation).
> >
> > I changed a few things recently so that the HTML code is cleaner.
> > I'm not a specialist, but now most of the pages go through
> > http://www.htmlvalidator.com/lite/ without problem.
> > (it's the lite version of an HTML validator).
>
> You should use the W3C validator:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.jmol.org
>
> There is no limitation, the service is free and provided my the W3C, the
> consortium who publishes the recommendations.

I have used the W3C validator to correct some of the Jmol pages.
Most of them are valid now, a few are still considered as invalid.